OPT: Slashdot | Long-Range Networking

[Declan McCullagh]

I believe we posted four articles today and only featured those four
on the Wired home page. This IMHO is a bad idea; we should leave yesterday's
on the home page tool, if only to avoid criticisms like the below.

As for Pinocchio, it's an explicit and major part of the movie, such
as it is. So it needs to be mentioned.

But anything deeper? I don't think so -- the movie was too much of a mismash
of themes to say that.

-Declan


On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 10:32:27PM -0400, George at Orwellian.Org wrote:
> Declan wrote:
> #    I was wondering how much Slashdot-spam traffic Choate adds
> #    to the list...
> 
> Maybe it's because there's nothing left at wired.com?
> 
> Wired has an entire 4 articles, with 13 Choatian links elsewhere.
> 
> If only Choate would bundle his stuff up each day.
> 
> ----
> 
> Thanks to the one person who told me Choate's link to
> openpgp being a working node was wrong.
> 
> I am now subscrived via lne.com, which has frighteningly
> little traffic. I am so used to the full flow of spam,
> it seems like something is wrong. Where have all my
> Nigerian/Fast Money/Bulk Email friends gone? Giganet?
> 
> ----
> 
> Declan, yours is not the only review of AI to mention Pinocchio.
> Doesn't it dredge up anything deeper, related to cybernetic life?
> 
> ----
> 
> May 7, 2001 NYT Patents
> #
> #    Many companies abandon potential trademark ideas when
> #    they cannot register the corresponding domain name.