Is minder.net really screwed up?

[Trei, Peter]

Thanks for the explanations. I deliberately picked minder over
lne because I don't support filtering by anyone but the 
final recipient.

Peter Trei


> ----------
> From: 	Brian Minder[SMTP:bmm at minder.net]
> Sent: 	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:05 PM
> To: 	Eric Murray
> Cc: 	Trei, Peter; 'cypherpunks at lne.com'
> Subject: 	Re: Is minder.net really screwed up?
> 
> Sircam is indeed the culprit.  minder.net usually delivers from 10^5 to
> 10^6 messages a day.  Since this latest worm the average has risen by
> an order of magnitude, though things have slowed down quite a bit in the
> last 24 hours.  We're working though the backlog.
> 
> As some of the mail I deliver is for paying, privacy oriented customers
> I'm obliged not to peek or filter to mitigate the situation as Eric has
> done.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Brian
> 
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Eric Murray wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
> > > When cyberpass started messing up a few weeks ago,
> > > I unsubbed there and resubbed at minder.net
> > >
> > > Several times, I've noticed that messages I sent were
> > > replied to long before I ever saw the original message
> > > come back.
> > >
> > > Yesterday I sent a message around 11AM, and just
> > > got the original back, over 24 hours later.
> 
[...]