AP Al Quim

[mattd]

"On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, mattd wrote: > There are checks and balances,get a 
grip.Read the essay. No, there are not. > Its self limiting.No one who is 
anonymous has anything to fear from AP. The only way that AP would be 
harmless to an anonymous person is if they were anonymous to EVERYONE. The 
entire point of AP is to provide a mechanism to reach ANYONE who might 
infringe upon your 'rights'. Trying to pitch AP as if only certain classes 
of people are at risk is simply ignorance (you didn't really read AP now 
did you) or else you intentionaly misrepresent. Either way, your point 
isn't valid."

Im not trying to pitch AP for anything.It applies to everyone not 
anonymous.Anybody can nominate anyone else.I was going to bring this up as 
sort of good indicator for 'reputations'.Negative reputations need 
rating,weighing and assessment too.
The name 'assasination politics' might be seen as a negative.I use 
operation soft drill.I think that though its paradoxical that threatening 
people could lead to world peace,as long as no ones died yet,its worth a 
shot.Theoretically no one has to die.
If I was saddam hussein and knew that a pool was accumulating on me.I might 
consider retirement.I dont think youve read the essay properly or you would 
remember the 'thermostat' and the 'car thieves' bits.The point is valid and 
the other point is not to panic.(seen any flying saucers lately?)