Borders UK and privacy
Duncan Frissell
frissell at panix.com
Thu Aug 30 11:59:16 PDT 2001
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Maybe, but it seems like offense just got a boost. Passive biodefenses
> don't work against an active offense. If sniffers start landing on your
> skin and taking a microscopic sample, then they won't be trivial to
> defend against.
How about a tailored virus that modifies your DNA on a rotating basis in
non significant fashion so that you're constantly "new". I wonder if
that would be theoretically possible? Fun times.
DCF
----
I suffer from a recognized social affective disorder that prevents me
from obeying government rules. I'm thus handicapped and protected by the ADA.
It's in the DSM-IV. You could look it up.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list