Bomb Law Reporter - special edition

[Aimee Farr]

Reese:
>  >> You are obviously
>  >> willing and able to provide the real citation, so what purpose was
>  >> served by changing all the names and obscuring the real cite, if
>  >> trickery was not a factor?
>  >
>  >No, Reese, I didn't want to expose an agent to Googling.
>
> Are court records public documents, or not?  Why wasn't that info sealed
> if there was a problem with releasing it?

There probably wasn't...agents go on the record. Agents don't get to use
remailers and cower behind them.

>  >> Talking about yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater is not the same as
>  >> doing it, no matter how "is" is defined, talking about bombs
> and making
>  >> them is no different.  Who was it?  Said "I disagree with what you say
>  >> but support your right to say it" or words to that effect?
>  >
>  >A modern version: "I disagree with bomb recipes, but support
> your right to
>  >provide bomb recipes, as long as I am not standing next to you, or
>  >associated with you in any way." Things work differently now, see?
>
> No, I don't *see*.  There is no reason why they should work differently,
> the relevant passages of the Constitution have not changed - the activism
> in the courtrooms is telling though.

I was being sarcastic.

Do you think you need probable cause for investigation?

~Aimee