CDR: Re: VerySafe?
brflgnk at cotse.com
brflgnk at cotse.com
Fri Nov 3 06:35:02 PST 2000
Quoting Greg Broiles <gbroiles at netbox.com>:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 07:34:27AM -0500, brflgnk at cotse.com wrote:
> > I think that's it exactly. Doesn't look like VerySafe is bringing
> > anything new
> > to the table. PGP already does self-decrypting files, and has better
> > support than just an Outlook plugin.
>
> Self-decrypting (and self-anything files that need executable
> permission)are tragedies waiting to occur.
I have to agree, and wasn't intending to promote their proliferation.
This is an essential problem, I think. Self-decryptors are easy for Joseph Q.
Sixpack, but train him to trust executable attachments in general.
> People who aren't technical enough to install their own copies of PGP
> shouldn't be encouraged to run unknown email attachments, no matter what
> the associated pretty icon looks like.
Which implies that such people will be denied crypto's benefits entirely.
Perhaps this is evolution in action?
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list