About 5yr. log retention

Jim Choate ravage at einstein.ssz.com
Tue Dec 5 16:28:39 PST 2000



On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, John Young wrote:

> The citation was given as the basis of the news story. And it shows that
> there is no five year retention requirement, only that the law is five years
> old.

What law?

Actually if you go look at the bottem of that news piece you'll find a
direct reference to CALEA (which I might add says nothing about log
retention for 'commen carrier' or otherwise).

I'd still like somebody to explain what law was in reference with respect
to requiring log retention for any period, irrespective of how old the law
is.

Note, this has NOTHING to do with a court order or request from a LEA and
at no point in that article was that claimed.

    ____________________________________________________________________

           Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a
           smaller group must first understand it.

                                           "Stranger Suns"
                                           George Zebrowski

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage at ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list