[cddlm] FW: OASIS SDD-TC

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Thanks Dejan,

Attached is a draft for SDD and ACS/CDDLM/JSDL discussion.
I value your feedbacks.
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) wrote:
> Hi Team,
> 
> Hiro will join us next meeting to discuss the topic addressed in the
> email below (SDD and ACS/CDDLM/JSDL). This will be a good opportunity to
> ask Hiro about his position wrt interoperability and standardization, as
> well as about other topics. BTW Hiro is the member of the CDDLM mailing
> list, so you can start any discussion using email.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dejan.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:22 PM
>> To: Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)
>> Cc: Stuart Schaefer; Jun Tatemura
>> Subject: Re: OASIS SDD-TC
>>
>> Thanks Dejan,
>>
>> I agree with you. Please discuss at your meeting. I can join to answer
> 
>> any question from your group if you like.
>>
>> It is May 3rd Wednesday 6am PDT (= 10pm JST), right?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> ----
>> Hiro Kishimoto
>>
>> Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) wrote:
>>> Thanks Hiro,
>>>
>>> I personally think that this is a good idea. Please let us discuss 
>>> this as a team at the next Wednesday meeting and I will get back to 
>>> you thereafter. Again, personally I think that this is the right 
>>> approach, but we are used to make decisions as a team and I
>> prefer to
>>> do it this way again.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Dejan. 
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 5:39 PM
>>>> To: Dejan Milojicic; Stuart Schaefer; Jun Tatemura
>>>> Subject: OASIS SDD-TC
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dejan, Stuart, and Jun,
>>>>
>>>> As you may already heard form Jun, OASIS SDD-TC (they are
>> working on
>>>> closely related technology; solution installation) is now
>> calling for
>>>> submission.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=sdd
>>>> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sdd/200604/msg00027.html
>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17882/oasis-
>>>> sdd-requirements-v1.1.doc
>>>>
>>>> Although their focus is non-grid domain, the last thing I
>> would see
>>>> is GGF and OASIS will publish two incompatible deployment
>> standards
>>>> and thus impose a unnecessary burden on both end users and
>> software
>>>> providers.
>>>>
>>>> In order to avoid such worst case scenario, I think GGF should 
>>>> provide related GGF specifications for SDD-TC and ask them to 
>>>> consider.
>>>> It does not mean CDDLM-WG should work with SDD-TC and modify or 
>>>> update your specs to meet their needs. Instead, just ask SDD-TC to 
>>>> make their spec compatible with CDDLM and another GGF's specs.
>>>>
>>>> The following is the list of GGF's specs we would like to offer;
>>>>
>>>> (1) Application Contents Service Specification 1.0
>>>> (2) CDDLM XML-CDL
>>>> (3) CDDLM component model
>>>> (4) Job Submission Description Language 1.0
>>>>      (SDD-TC also covers required resource description)
>>>>
>>>> We exclude CDDLM Deployment API since SDD-TC does not
>> cover interface
>>>> specification.
>>>>
>>>> It is very important for OGSA and GGF in general to keep
>> consistent
>>>> with wider Web service community. For this reason, ACS-WG
>> and JSDL-WG
>>>> already agree to the above plan and we would like to hear your 
>>>> thoughts.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Hiro Kishimoto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ggf2sdd-20060502.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 201728 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/cddlm-wg/attachments/20060502/21537b4c/attachment.doc