[cddlm] OGSA call summary

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Hi Andreas,

Let's post this issue to XML-CDL public comment tracker.
Then CDDLM team will revise CDL spec before publication.

https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=599
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Andreas Savva wrote:
> Wrt to the 'lazy' discussion, can you also update the CDL spec to make
> clear that the user (or other entities) may also do the lazy resolution
> at any time before actual deployment? I am referring to text like
> l.30-34, page 25, of the public comment version of the CDL spec.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> Stuart Schaefer wrote:
>> At today’s OGSA call, three issues were on the table for our team.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The first two were not discussed.  Hiro and Jun have an action item to
>> discuss default components.  Steve Newhouse has an action item to
>> document his usage cases for conversation.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The final topic was the issue of CDL lazy references being overrideable
>> by a user of the system.  According to the CDL specification, the
>> cdl:lazy attribute can have a Boolean value.  Thus, this allows a
>> template to have a property with cdl:lazy equal to true.  In a CDL file
>> which imports or extends from this template, the appropriate property
>> can set the attribute value to false, and then provide a value for the
>> property.  This explanation was sufficient for the OGSA team to clarify
>> the successful handling of this usage case.
>