[cddlm] Doubts about Component Model

[Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid]

Hi Stuart,

the "Last Call" version according to my mails is the 'Draft
2005-06-09' sent on June 20th. Are you talking about this version? 


In this version, there are examples using internal elements and examples 
without them. Some of the examples must be checked because they are not 
well formed. Another problem is that in the repository, there are 
examples of valid cdls that are not valid anymore according to the 
component-model schema.

Regarding the wsdl errors, I will wait your answer to be sure I'm 
working with the correct version.

Ayla

Stuart Schaefer wrote:

>Ayla,
>
>The Component Model document was updated to clarify this.  The "Last
>Call" version changed the examples.  Internal elements are not allowed.
>Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the
>property list.  They cannot have child nodes.
>
>Please let me know about the wsdl errors.  I will take a look as soon as
>you forward the details.
>
>Stuart
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
>[mailto:ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br] 
>Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:18 AM
>To: 'cddlm-wg at ggf.org'
>Subject: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model
>
>Hi,
>
>we are having some problems in understanding the correct use of control 
>flow elements from the component model. According to the schema, the 
>cmp:sequence and cmp:flow elements, cannot have internal elements (like 
>in the 'delegate' declaration), but according to some examples from the 
>component model Word document, components can be defined inside these 
>elements. Which option is the correct one?
>
>We also had some problems in the component-model.wsdl, specially 
>regarding namespaces use, message definitions missing and some typos. In
>
>another mail I will send more details about this.
>Best regards,
>  Ayla
>
>
>  
>