[cddlm] Doubts about Component Model

[Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid]

Stuart,

I've tested it performing the following changes to make it work with 
Muse until the point I could go before:
- I've included a <wsdl:binding> element (even do not complete for all 
the operations in the port type) and a <wsdl:service> element
- I've put the <wsdl:imports> before the <wsdl:types> declaration
-  I've corrected the targetNamespace value in:
    <xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified"
      
targetNamespace="http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/componentsi/2005/02/wsdl">
to
    <xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified"
      
targetNamespace="http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02/wsdl">

- I've corrected the typo <wsdl:fault name="StateActiontFault" 
message="cmpw:StateActionFault"/>


Best regards,
  Ayla


Stuart Schaefer wrote:

>Ayla,
>
>Thank you for your feedback.  I made these edits a little differently,
>and passed them through several validating parser-generators.  Can you
>test the attached file?
>
>Staurt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
>[mailto:ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br] 
>Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:11 PM
>To: Stuart Schaefer
>Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
>Subject: Re: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model
>
>Hi Stuart,
>
>sorry for the delay.
>I still have some problems with the Component Model wsdl file that I'm 
>trying to solve, but I will let you know about some errors that I've 
>already changed here:
>   * The targetNamespace used in the wsdl file was the same of the 
>component-model.xsd. I've included the "/wsdl" at the end of the target 
>namespace, and I've also declared "xmlns:tns" with this namespace.
>   * The <wsdl:types> element of the wsdl is missing.  In this part I 
>import the schemas used.
>   * The "taskActionResponse" message should be as follows instead of 
>refering to "taskActionRequest":
>    <wsdl:message name="taskActionResponse">
>        <wsdl:part name="taskActionResponse" 
>element="cmp:taskActionResponse"/>
>    </wsdl:message>
>   * The "StateActionFault" message was missing:
>    <wsdl:message name="StateActionFault">
>        <wsdl:part name="fault" element="cmp:StateActionFault"/>
>    </wsdl:message-->   
>   * The "ComponentEndpoint" attribute wsrp:resourceProperties should be
>
>"wsrp:ResourceProperties"
>   * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "GetResourceProperty",
>
>"SetResourceProperty", "QueryResourceProperties" and 
>"GetMultipleResourceProperties" operations should be "wsrpw"(wsdl file) 
>instead of "wsrp" (which would be the schema).
>   * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "Destroy" operation 
>should be "wsrlw" instead of "wsrl"
>   * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "Initialize", 
>"Terminate", "Run" and "RunTask" operations should be "tns" instead of 
>"cmp".
>   * There is a typo in the "Run" operation: "StateActiontFault" should 
>be replaced by "StateActionFault"
>   * In the "RunTask" operation, the "taskActionResponsne" should be 
>"taskActionResponse"
>   * wsdl:binding and wsdl:service parts are missing in the wsdl
>definition.
>
>Best regards,
>  Ayla
>
>Stuart Schaefer wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Ayla,
>>
>>The Component Model document was updated to clarify this.  The "Last
>>Call" version changed the examples.  Internal elements are not allowed.
>>Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the
>>property list.  They cannot have child nodes.
>>
>>Please let me know about the wsdl errors.  I will take a look as soon
>>    
>>
>as
>  
>
>>you forward the details.
>>
>>Stuart
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
>>[mailto:ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br] 
>>Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:18 AM
>>To: 'cddlm-wg at ggf.org'
>>Subject: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>we are having some problems in understanding the correct use of control
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>flow elements from the component model. According to the schema, the 
>>cmp:sequence and cmp:flow elements, cannot have internal elements (like
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>in the 'delegate' declaration), but according to some examples from the
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>component model Word document, components can be defined inside these 
>>elements. Which option is the correct one?
>>
>>We also had some problems in the component-model.wsdl, specially 
>>regarding namespaces use, message definitions missing and some typos.
>>    
>>
>In
>  
>
>>another mail I will send more details about this.
>>Best regards,
>> Ayla
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/cddlm-wg/attachments/20050705/ba0a4228/attachment.html