[cddlm] XML-CDL feedback resolution

[Keisuke Fukui]

Jun,

Thanks for your consideration on our comments.

Jun Tatemura wrote:
 > Dear Team,
 > Please find the attached file that lists comments/feedbacks
 > with my answers and action lists (I apologize the list is not
 > complete) which I would like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

I have no problem with your proposed resolutions.

> 
> - The language requirements are defined in each released document
>  (foundation document / SF-CDL / XML-CDL) and they are slightly different
>  each other. We will appreciate a bit clarification or justification for it.
> 
> [Answer]
> Requirements to SF-CDL and XML-CDL are by definition different (that's why
> we have two languages)...
> It may be a good idea to revisit these requirements issue, though.
> 

I understand a part of the situation and am looking forward to seeing
this mentioned in other documents, such as the CDDLM primer mentioned.

Regards,
Keisuke Fukui