[caops-wg] GFD.125 to P-REC?

Mike Jones mike.jones at manchester.ac.uk
Fri Aug 5 09:16:16 CDT 2011


I can't remember what was agreed in Salt Lake City regarding comments for 
GFD.125.

That said: The emailAddress vs Email issue has just lit up again on a UK 
mailing list.

Do we have the opportunity for, and should we consider, strengthening the 
SHOULD NOT use emailaddress in subject names to a MUST NOT?

It's still "deprecated but permitted" in the replacement of RFC3280 by 
RFC5280.

Mike

On Monday 31 January 2011 08:01:05 Alan Sill wrote:
> Hi David and the CAOps group,
> 
> I'd like to suggest that we think collectively about the considerations
> that have led us to put forward the very useful and by now quite mature
> CAOPs document GFD.125 as a "COmmunity Practice" document and not as a
> proposed recommendation.  I understand that historically, there was some
> thought that this profile might not represent a collection of items that
> ought to be standardized, but I think that experience has shown most of
> its content to be important, if not essential.
> 
> With this in mind, I'd like to raise the issue of whether this quite mature
> document, or another one quite close to it in intent, might be worth
> putting forward into the stream as a proposed recommendation.  To go from
> a proposed to a full recommendation would take the passage of some time
> and demonstration of multiple implementations; I am willing to consider
> the multiple adoptions of GFD.125 by CAs throughout the world as
> implementations for this purpose.
> 
> There may be other points of view, but now is the time to discuss them, I
> think, and so would like to ask for your input.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alan
> --
>   caops-wg mailing list
>   caops-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/caops-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/caops-wg/attachments/20110805/ba004391/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/caops-wg/attachments/20110805/ba004391/attachment.bin 


More information about the caops-wg mailing list