[caops-wg] OCSP & Proxy Certs

[Mike Helm]

So, which document, in what form, and what is the current draft?

Olle Mulmo writes:
> 
> Mike,
> 
> The major conclusion from the CAOPS sessions in regards to OCSP is  
> that we do not have consensus or know-how in regards to proxy  
> certificates, and so therefore (most) people agreed to simply list  
> them as an outstanding issue at this point in time, and then let this  
> document onwards in the publication pipeline.
> 
> Hopefully the minutes will cover the discussions in more details.
> 
> /Olle
> 
> On Feb 21, 2006, at 21:01, Mike Helm wrote:
> 
> >
> > I was talking to Frank Siebenlist of Argonne & Globus,
> > and he is interested in taking on some of the client side
> > issues in the OCSP Requiremets paper & making sure they are  
> > properly addressed.
> > This is something he and Von Welch, in another context, have
> > emphasized as being very important for OCSP and similar
> > services.   This attention & input should be very useful.
> >
> > What was the discussion at CAOPS at GGF-16?  I haven't seen
> > any minutes or feedback.
> >
> > Thanks, ==mwh
> > Michael Helm
> > ESnet/LBL
> >
>