# Why is a racist like a bad dog? Both mark their territory with shit. # A fat racist and a skinny racist jump off a cliff. Who wins? Society. # How many Nazis does it take to change a light bulb? 100. 1 to change the bulb and 99 to deny it ever happened. # What do you call a racist abortion centre? Crime stoppers. # What’s the difference between a racist and a bucket of sludge? The bucket. # What’s the difference between a ghost and a racist? One is a sheet-wearing spook who tries to scare people out of their homes, and the other one is a dead guy. -- "The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."
On 1/11/2017 6:08 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
# What’s the difference between a ghost and a racist? One is a sheet-wearing spook who tries to scare people out of their homes, and the other one is a dead guy.
Observe BLM ethnically cleansing Ferguson, while you cheer them. Because you think that if you cheer loud enough they will not come for you. If you are white, you are racist. If you are racist, which is to say white, a large proportion of the voters, soon to be a majority, believe you should be physically attacked. Recall the debate on Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman: If Martin attacked Zimmerman, Zimmerman was innocent. If Zimmerman attacked Martin, Zimmerman guilty of murder. Everyone who claimed Zimmerman was guilty claimed to believe that Zimmerman attacked Martin - but, as evidence for their position, presented not evidence that Zimmerman attacked Martin, but evidence that Zimmerman behaved provocatively by profiling Martin, thus justifying Martin chimping out on Zimmerman. They claimed to believe that Zimmerman attacked Martin, but as evidence for this supposed belief presented grounds for Martin to attack Zimmerman. They claimed to believe that Zimmerman attacked Martin, but their words betrayed the belief that blacks are entitled to physically attack whites and whites are not entitled to defend themselves.
I never said the racist was white... You are f_cking racist, Donald. Tsk, tsk... :) Well, Mirimir is right. Now you are blocked and will go directly to my trash. Why should I spend my precious time with a small-minded person? It would be pure 'mottainai'! :) -- "The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/2017 03:31 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
On 1/11/2017 6:08 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
# What’s the difference between a ghost and a racist? One is a sheet-wearing spook who tries to scare people out of their homes, and the other one is a dead guy.
Observe BLM ethnically cleansing Ferguson, while you cheer them. Because you think that if you cheer loud enough they will not come for you.
If you are white, you are racist. If you are racist, which is to say white, a large proportion of the voters, soon to be a majority, believe you should be physically attacked.
What a nasty little fantasy world. I guess living in it makes a certain kind of sense, if the color of your skin is literally the only basis you have for any kind of personal pride or self esteem. Point to someone who looks different and say "At least I ain't no God damned [nigger, raghead, or etc]." Ta-daa, instant winner. Be sure to pick up your Very Special blue-ribbon award for just showing up. The rest of us could easily afford to ignore racists, if not for the fact that racists are cowards, and cowards strike from behind. They like to run in packs, and yearn for a Voice Of Authority to tell them they are better than other people and promise them big rewards for unthinking obedience. So the rest of us have to monitor racists like any other toxic weeds, and occasionally cut them down to size. Enjoy displaying your categorical inferiority to the world. Maybe you were born with it, but it took a lifetime to sharpen it to a point and learn how to write with it. Better keep it behind the keyboard, though, because you were born 50 years too late. Getting laughed at will be the least of your worries if you carry it outside and try to act it out in the real world. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYdmFEAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqWi4H/3Wi/gs9IDDOIymuY9D2guX9 C96PkkdwYww/mmHZeLjxpMv9HqJLuocaplK8GfRHwIsCHKQLW1mPaFoXggoeQu9J TL/FCoCm0R8H1j5xOButPho5Stx79ieGOLwKymPgN0dLcRxFJmssVuAvutHps7BX YLEe2exFsijd/uia3ySxlwojxoQ0qyWPwkrA+zf9c+w9/93vRid9RacQzPvJl9CS ctGhnIV8XLb1+QaCJRO8hnvWF1oRN7P3h4V7nH6we7mZV+Sx8jEyQNG6b1js9U6n WMD/QwA43BiS8KjGfXnKEqHzJk3rPBPSLotbNx4ISGmVw1t2Yp1OPWBjoSt2J2c= =IE1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If you are white, you are racist. If you are racist, which is to say white, a large proportion of the voters, soon to be a majority, believe you should be physically attacked.
On 1/12/2017 2:45 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
What a nasty little fantasy world.
Pretty much everyone who thought Zimmerman guilty, and pretty much everyone who prematurely condemned the Duke Lacrosse team on the testimony of a lying drunken thieving violent black whore who was trying to talk her way out of a yet another charge of violent drunken assault in a long history of violent drunken assaults and stupid violent thefts, believes that blacks have right to chimp out on whites because all whites are guilty of racism, believe that whites make Africa and Detroit poor, and that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have. That was implicit in the arguments we heard for the guilt of Zimmerman, and implicit in the arguments we heard for the premature conviction of the Duke Lacrosse team. Pretty much everyone who has been educated in Harvard believes that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have. When Obama says "You did not build that", what near fifty percent of the voters hear is that wealth just springs forth from the magic dirt, and due to racism, white people get it all. When the BLM burns down a supermarket that whites built and beats up the whites that built it, and that supermarket is not promptly replaced by a supermarket run by black women that gives out stuff for free, they think that the reason they were not given a supermarket the way white males supposedly were given ("You did not build that") is racism. They are outraged and indignant that they do not get a new supermarket the way that Obama told them whites got a new supermarket. That is the worldview taught in Harvard, and its logical implication is that all whites should be murdered. Harvard, and Obama, preach slogans that like "liquidation of the kulaks as a class" preserve a careful ambiguity between erasing white culture and civilization, and erasing whites physically. Harvard engages in symbolic acts erasing white civilization, but when these symbolic acts get down to their vote bank, the mass of the voters hear Harvard instigating the physical erasure of whites, that the physical erasure of whites is desirable and morally right.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 07:53:32 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
Pretty much everyone who has been educated in Harvard
That is the worldview taught in Harvard,
Harvard, and Obama, preach slogans that
the mass of the voters hear Harvard instigating
Tell me James, Who 'built' and who ran and who runs Harvard?
On Wed, Jan 11 2017 13:53:32 -1300 "James A. Donald" <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
blacks have right to chimp out
So you suport "black" rights.
b/c all whites are guilty of racism, make Africa and Detroit poor, and if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
lol.
Duke Lacrosse team.
Lacrosse fags are guilty of everything, just like soccer fags. These are some of the worst people in society, after LEOs like lawyers and judges.
the worldview taught in Harvard Harvard engages in symbolic acts erasing white civilization
Please continue with more detail, and maybe some references, please. -- Al
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:53:32AM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
If you are white, you are racist. If you are racist, which is to say white, a large proportion of the voters, soon to be a majority, believe you should be physically attacked.
On 1/12/2017 2:45 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
What a nasty little fantasy world.
Pretty much everyone who thought Zimmerman guilty, and pretty much everyone who prematurely condemned the Duke Lacrosse team on the testimony of a lying drunken thieving violent black whore who was trying to talk her way out of a yet another charge of violent drunken assault in a long history of violent drunken assaults and stupid violent thefts, believes that blacks have right to chimp out on whites because all whites are guilty of racism, believe that whites make Africa and Detroit poor, and that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
That was implicit in the arguments we heard for the guilt of Zimmerman, and implicit in the arguments we heard for the premature conviction of the Duke Lacrosse team.
Pretty much everyone who has been educated in Harvard believes that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
When Obama says "You did not build that", what near fifty percent of the voters hear is that wealth just springs forth from the magic dirt, and due to racism, white people get it all.
When the BLM burns down a supermarket that whites built and beats up the whites that built it, and that supermarket is not promptly replaced by a supermarket run by black women that gives out stuff for free, they think that the reason they were not given a supermarket the way white males supposedly were given ("You did not build that") is racism.
They are outraged and indignant that they do not get a new supermarket the way that Obama told them whites got a new supermarket.
That is the worldview taught in Harvard, and its logical implication is that all whites should be murdered.
Harvard, and Obama, preach slogans that like "liquidation of the kulaks as a class" preserve a careful ambiguity between erasing white culture and civilization, and erasing whites physically. Harvard engages in symbolic acts erasing white civilization, but when these symbolic acts get down to their vote bank, the mass of the voters hear Harvard instigating the physical erasure of whites, that the physical erasure of whites is desirable and morally right.
And to top it off, when someone such as myself speaks a desire for "racial strength", "white pride" or "desire for an ethnostate", the universal response is one of: - check your privilege! - you racist pig! - repeat after me, "I am NOT oppressed"! Every 'Western' country MUST have open borders, except for Israel of course. And DARE anyone speak of such horrible biases in the collective public conversation. Zenaan
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:44:21PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:53:32AM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
If you are white, you are racist. If you are racist, which is to say white, a large proportion of the voters, soon to be a majority, believe you should be physically attacked.
On 1/12/2017 2:45 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
What a nasty little fantasy world.
Pretty much everyone who thought Zimmerman guilty, and pretty much everyone who prematurely condemned the Duke Lacrosse team on the testimony of a lying drunken thieving violent black whore who was trying to talk her way out of a yet another charge of violent drunken assault in a long history of violent drunken assaults and stupid violent thefts, believes that blacks have right to chimp out on whites because all whites are guilty of racism, believe that whites make Africa and Detroit poor, and that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
That was implicit in the arguments we heard for the guilt of Zimmerman, and implicit in the arguments we heard for the premature conviction of the Duke Lacrosse team.
Pretty much everyone who has been educated in Harvard believes that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
When Obama says "You did not build that", what near fifty percent of the voters hear is that wealth just springs forth from the magic dirt, and due to racism, white people get it all.
When the BLM burns down a supermarket that whites built and beats up the whites that built it, and that supermarket is not promptly replaced by a supermarket run by black women that gives out stuff for free, they think that the reason they were not given a supermarket the way white males supposedly were given ("You did not build that") is racism.
They are outraged and indignant that they do not get a new supermarket the way that Obama told them whites got a new supermarket.
That is the worldview taught in Harvard, and its logical implication is that all whites should be murdered.
Harvard, and Obama, preach slogans that like "liquidation of the kulaks as a class" preserve a careful ambiguity between erasing white culture and civilization, and erasing whites physically. Harvard engages in symbolic acts erasing white civilization, but when these symbolic acts get down to their vote bank, the mass of the voters hear Harvard instigating the physical erasure of whites, that the physical erasure of whites is desirable and morally right.
And to top it off, when someone such as myself speaks a desire for "racial strength", "white pride" or "desire for an ethnostate", the universal response is one of:
- check your privilege!
Every soul is privileged to be born into the family and region in which they are born. The diversity of rich experiences around the world bodes well for souls who might grow, learn and or develop as souls, wrt the experiences they have in their lives. True diversity would be lost if homogeneity were to become omnipresent. This "dire diversity dichotomy" is never acknowledged by The Left.
- you racist pig!
The will to live according to ones own inner direction, ones own personal authority and preferences, can never be entirely extinguished by any external regime, no matter how gilded the Lefties paint their particular picture of an homogeneous pampered utopia.
- repeat after me, "I am NOT oppressed"!
The desire of some humans to impose their will on other humans, appears to know no limits. To truly respect the will of another, requires giving full acknowledgement or "credit" to his right to have a say in EVERY thing he is called upon to support or to oppose, to participate in or to "be taken to tacitly support" (the insidious expression of "modern democratic states").
Every 'Western' country MUST have open borders, except for Israel of course. And DARE anyone speak of such horrible biases in the collective public conversation.
Zenaan
It is true that in the discussion of any particular existential problem which has been created by the "government" of the day, we often find ourselves hopelessly bound into the parameters of discussion (and parameters of solution) implied by that "government of the day". This is not necessarily in our interest. But neither is it in our interest to disregard solutions to problems, and the modulo of time (expediency, and looming 'disaster') that we find ourselves within. Aka, you got a brain, use it. Z
Looks like there really is "white" privelege, just not quite what we've been lead to believe ... pic attached. Enjoy, and create your world :) On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:56:31AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:44:21PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:53:32AM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
If you are white, you are racist. If you are racist, which is to say white, a large proportion of the voters, soon to be a majority, believe you should be physically attacked.
On 1/12/2017 2:45 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
What a nasty little fantasy world.
Pretty much everyone who thought Zimmerman guilty, and pretty much everyone who prematurely condemned the Duke Lacrosse team on the testimony of a lying drunken thieving violent black whore who was trying to talk her way out of a yet another charge of violent drunken assault in a long history of violent drunken assaults and stupid violent thefts, believes that blacks have right to chimp out on whites because all whites are guilty of racism, believe that whites make Africa and Detroit poor, and that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
That was implicit in the arguments we heard for the guilt of Zimmerman, and implicit in the arguments we heard for the premature conviction of the Duke Lacrosse team.
Pretty much everyone who has been educated in Harvard believes that if only whites were eliminated other races would have all the stuff that whites have.
When Obama says "You did not build that", what near fifty percent of the voters hear is that wealth just springs forth from the magic dirt, and due to racism, white people get it all.
When the BLM burns down a supermarket that whites built and beats up the whites that built it, and that supermarket is not promptly replaced by a supermarket run by black women that gives out stuff for free, they think that the reason they were not given a supermarket the way white males supposedly were given ("You did not build that") is racism.
They are outraged and indignant that they do not get a new supermarket the way that Obama told them whites got a new supermarket.
That is the worldview taught in Harvard, and its logical implication is that all whites should be murdered.
Harvard, and Obama, preach slogans that like "liquidation of the kulaks as a class" preserve a careful ambiguity between erasing white culture and civilization, and erasing whites physically. Harvard engages in symbolic acts erasing white civilization, but when these symbolic acts get down to their vote bank, the mass of the voters hear Harvard instigating the physical erasure of whites, that the physical erasure of whites is desirable and morally right.
And to top it off, when someone such as myself speaks a desire for "racial strength", "white pride" or "desire for an ethnostate", the universal response is one of:
- check your privilege!
Every soul is privileged to be born into the family and region in which they are born.
The diversity of rich experiences around the world bodes well for souls who might grow, learn and or develop as souls, wrt the experiences they have in their lives.
True diversity would be lost if homogeneity were to become omnipresent. This "dire diversity dichotomy" is never acknowledged by The Left.
- you racist pig!
The will to live according to ones own inner direction, ones own personal authority and preferences, can never be entirely extinguished by any external regime, no matter how gilded the Lefties paint their particular picture of an homogeneous pampered utopia.
- repeat after me, "I am NOT oppressed"!
The desire of some humans to impose their will on other humans, appears to know no limits.
To truly respect the will of another, requires giving full acknowledgement or "credit" to his right to have a say in EVERY thing he is called upon to support or to oppose, to participate in or to "be taken to tacitly support" (the insidious expression of "modern democratic states").
Every 'Western' country MUST have open borders, except for Israel of course. And DARE anyone speak of such horrible biases in the collective public conversation.
Zenaan
It is true that in the discussion of any particular existential problem which has been created by the "government" of the day, we often find ourselves hopelessly bound into the parameters of discussion (and parameters of solution) implied by that "government of the day".
This is not necessarily in our interest.
But neither is it in our interest to disregard solutions to problems, and the modulo of time (expediency, and looming 'disaster') that we find ourselves within.
Aka, you got a brain, use it.
Z
On 01/11/2017 03:08 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
# Why is a racist like a bad dog? Both mark their territory with shit. # A fat racist and a skinny racist jump off a cliff. Who wins? Society. # How many Nazis does it take to change a light bulb? 100. 1 to change the bulb and 99 to deny it ever happened. # What do you call a racist abortion centre? Crime stoppers. # What’s the difference between a racist and a bucket of sludge? The bucket.
# What’s the difference between a ghost and a racist? One is a sheet-wearing spook who tries to scare people out of their homes, and the other one is a dead guy.
Sorry Ceci - this one is wrong. The answer is one bullet ;-)
-- "The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Marina Brown <catskillmarina@gmail.com> wrote:
On 01/11/2017 03:08 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
# What’s the difference between a ghost and a racist? One is a sheet-wearing spook who tries to scare people out of their homes, and the other one is a dead guy.
Sorry Ceci - this one is wrong. The answer is one bullet ;-)
Hahaha!! Thanks for the correction, my dear Marina! ;D Do you know which was the funniest thing that happened with me this week? I received a racist private message, asking about the color of my skin. Well, usually I am 'whiter' than Zzz. My skin is, at least, two or three shades clearer than his. In Juan's country, they used to call me "Eddie" in a hackerspace, making a fun reference to the vampire Edward, who is so pale that 'sparkles under the sunlight', hahaha!! ;D Love you, muuuaaah! Take care, sweetie! <3 Ceci
On 01/14/2017 06:11 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Marina Brown <catskillmarina@gmail.com <mailto:catskillmarina@gmail.com>>wrote:
On 01/11/2017 03:08 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> # What’s the difference between a ghost and a racist? One is a > sheet-wearing spook who tries to scare people out of their homes, and > the other one is a dead guy.
Sorry Ceci - this one is wrong. The answer is one bullet ;-)
Hahaha!! Thanks for the correction, my dear Marina! ;D
Do you know which was the funniest thing that happened with me this week? I received a racist private message, asking about the color of my skin. Well, usually I am 'whiter' than Zzz. My skin is, at least, two or three shades clearer than his. In Juan's country, they used to call me "Eddie" in a hackerspace, making a fun reference to the vampire Edward, who is so pale that 'sparkles under the sunlight', hahaha!! ;D
Love you, muuuaaah! Take care, sweetie! <3
Ceci
You keep this list entertaining. No one trolls idiotic nazis as well as you do !
participants (7)
-
Big 'Uns -
Cecilia Tanaka -
James A. Donald -
juan -
Marina Brown -
Steve Kinney -
Zenaan Harkness