On 2/6/2017 12:21 AM, John Young wrote:

Declaring anything terrorist fosters the recruiting brand, ignores the reality of profligate spending on mil-cop-spy phantasms, top competitora for kiddie porn, especially online -- see front page of NYTimes today about remote-controlled ISIS terrorism via the demon Internet. Fucking A, this list terrorist from Day One.

Antifa is funded by George Soros. Declaring it terrorist allows the FBI to go after funders and organizers like Soros and Berkeley University. At present the FBI has to go after individual antifa who commit individual criminal acts, which is like swatting mosquitoes one at a time.

On February 9, 2017 8:18:51 PM EST, "James A. Donald" wrote:

...

Declaring anything terrorist fosters the recruiting brand, ignores

On 2/6/2017 12:21 AM, John Young wrote: the

...

reality of profligate spending on mil-cop-spy phantasms, top competitora for kiddie porn, especially online -- see front page of NYTimes today about remote-controlled ISIS terrorism via the demon Internet. Fucking A, this list terrorist from Day One.

Antifa is funded by George Soros. Declaring it terrorist allows the FBI to go after funders and organizers like Soros and Berkeley University.

At present the FBI has to go after individual antifa who commit individual criminal acts, which is like swatting mosquitoes one at a time.

Give me a fucking break.. With your delusions of King Trump and giving all the "liberal lefties" "helicopter rides", not to mention all the other toxic shit you spew, you're fucking 1000x the "terrorist" any antifa that clocks Dick Spencer is, you fucking worm. Fuck the FBI and double-fuck you =) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

On February 10, 2017 4:26:04 AM EST, Zenaan Harkness wrote:

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:33:11PM -0500, John Newman wrote:

...

On February 9, 2017 8:18:51 PM EST, "James A. Donald" wrote:

...

...

Declaring anything terrorist fosters the recruiting brand, ignores

On 2/6/2017 12:21 AM, John Young wrote: the

...

reality of profligate spending on mil-cop-spy phantasms, top competitora for kiddie porn, especially online -- see front page of NYTimes today about remote-controlled ISIS terrorism via the demon Internet. Fucking A, this list terrorist from Day One.

Antifa is funded by George Soros. Declaring it terrorist allows the FBI to go after funders and organizers like Soros and Berkeley University.

At present the FBI has to go after individual antifa who commit individual criminal acts, which is like swatting mosquitoes one at a time.

Give me a fucking break..

With your delusions of King Trump and giving all the "liberal lefties" "helicopter rides", not to mention all the other toxic shit you spew, you're fucking 1000x the "terrorist" any antifa that clocks Dick Spencer is, you fucking worm.

Noted - physical abuse is "nothing" compared to ...

wicious words! <ooh-so-scary rimshot>

Stop! People are speaking, they must ... STOP! It's terrorism, STOP SPEAKING YOU WICIOUS TERRORIST!!

Note that terrorist was put in quotes "terrorist" because the whole thing is a mockery. Kinda like calling you a "decent human being". But I wouldn't expect you to pick up on such subtleties =) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

On 02/09/2017 08:18 PM, James A. Donald wrote:

On 2/6/2017 12:21 AM, John Young wrote:

...

Declaring anything terrorist fosters the recruiting brand, ignores the reality of profligate spending on mil-cop-spy phantasms, top competitora for kiddie porn, especially online -- see front page of NYTimes today about remote-controlled ISIS terrorism via the demon Internet. Fucking A, this list terrorist from Day One.

Antifa is funded by George Soros. Declaring it terrorist allows the FBI to go after funders and organizers like Soros and Berkeley University.

At present the FBI has to go after individual antifa who commit individual criminal acts, which is like swatting mosquitoes one at a time.

Hahaha - tell me where to get my check from Daddy Soros. I sure need it.

On 2/10/2017 2:31 PM, Marina Brown wrote:

Hahaha - tell me where to get my check from Daddy Soros. I sure need it.

Soros directly funds and directly controls the Tides foundation. The Tides foundation directly funds The Alliance for Global Justice The Alliance for Global Justice gave fifty thousand dollars “Refuse Fascism” which staged the riot at Berkeley.

On 02/10/2017 01:50 AM, jim bell wrote:

a repeat performance of OWS-behavior might draw the attention of the Federal "Justice Department".

You don't follow along very well. ALL the lights and buzzers went off at every fusion center in the US because your Billionaire's bffs KNOW how to pigeonhole and divert single issue protests and their orgs, but general insurrection? ROTF NOT! Occupy SCARED THE LIVING SHIT out of 'the powers that be' (at least until most of them were coopted by Right-wingers or Prog-Libs who the gubmint colludes with), and Soros? What's his interest? Money. That's ALL the uber-wealthy are interested in, or else you'll NEVER have all that money. Money and the power it buys. That money, as exemplified by what Donald Trump, LOSER, is doing right now, can be made by creating Chaos. Soros has ZERO interest in 'social change'. He is interested in making money from destabilizing societies. In the long run, I'd say he'll be burning his bonds for heat in a mud hut. But he's be dead long before then like most of the Old Rich White Men. Rr Ps. “I learned how to play Monopoly from my grandmother. She was a wonderful person. She raised six children. She was a widow by the time that I knew her. But she was the most ruthless Monopoly player I have ever known in my life. She understood that the name of the game was to acquire. When she played and I got my initial money from the bank, I would just try to hold onto it, because I didn’t want to lose any of it. She spent everything, bought stuff she landed on as soon as she could, and she’d mortgage it to buy more stuff. And of course, the way the game goes, eventually she would accumulate everything. She would be the master of the board. She understood that money was how you keep score in the game, possessions are a matter of survival. And she beat me every time. And at the end of the game she would look at me and she’d say, “One day you’ll learn how to play the game.” She was kind of cocky, my grandmother. When I was about ten, I played every day through the Summer holidays with a friend. It dawned on me the only way to win was total commitment to acquisition. That summer I learned how to play the game. And by the time autumn rolled around, I was more ruthless than even my grandmother. I went to play her, and I was willing to do anything to win. I was willing to bend the rules. I played with sweaty palms. Slowly, cunningly I exposed the soft underbelly of my grandmother’s weakness. Relentlessly, inexorably, I drove her off the board. The game does strange things to you. I can still remember the day like yesterday. I looked at my grandmother. This is the person who taught me how to play. She was an old woman by now. She was a widow. She had raised my mother. She loved me. And I took everything she had. I destroyed her financially and psychologically. I watched her give her last dollar and quit in utter defeat. This was the greatest moment of my life. And then she had one more lesson to teach me, my grandmother. Then she said to me, “Now it all goes back in the box.” It all goes back in the box. All of the houses and hotels, Mayfair and Park Lane, all of those railway stations and utilities, all of that wonderful money. It all goes back in the box,” she said. But I didn’t want it all to go back in the box. I wanted to leave the board out permanently — bronze it maybe, as a memorial to what I had achieved. See, when she said, “It all goes back in the box,” it was kind of a way of saying to me, “None of it’s really yours. It doesn’t belong to you. You don’t own any of it. You just used it for a little while. And now it all goes back in the box. And next time it’ll all go to somebody else. That’s the way the game works. So when you play the game, don’t forget this one lesson. When the game comes to an end.... ...and the game always comes to an end, the stuff all goes back in the box.” There is a simple, two-word question we tend not to ask ourselves. “Then what?” When I’ve reached the top, then what? When I have it all, then what? When I finally have enough, when I am financially secure, when I’ve got the sought after promotion, made the ultimate purchase, got the ideal home, assured financial security, and climbed the ladder of success to the highest rung, and then the thrill wears off–and it will wear off—sooner or later you’re faced with the nagging question, “Then what?” ~Dr. James Dobson

On 02/09/2017 11:38 PM, James A. Donald wrote:

On 2/10/2017 2:31 PM, Marina Brown wrote:

...

Hahaha - tell me where to get my check from Daddy Soros. I sure need it.

Soros directly funds and directly controls the Tides foundation.

The Tides foundation directly funds The Alliance for Global Justice

The Alliance for Global Justice gave fifty thousand dollars “Refuse Fascism” which staged the riot at Berkeley.

Where'd you get that last bit of bullshit? Art Bell/Coast to Coast or Alex Jones? Ps. Tides also gives money to Adbusters' foundation. I suppose you think Occupy was a Soros production too ... because Fascists HAVE TO BELIEVE that people can't 'think for themselves', shmuck. Rr

On 02/10/2017 02:38 AM, James A. Donald wrote:

On 2/10/2017 2:31 PM, Marina Brown wrote:

...

Hahaha - tell me where to get my check from Daddy Soros. I sure need it.

Soros directly funds and directly controls the Tides foundation.

The Tides foundation directly funds The Alliance for Global Justice

The Alliance for Global Justice gave fifty thousand dollars “Refuse Fascism” which staged the riot at Berkeley. .

Yep - put the blame on the revolutionary communist party - it will take the heat off the real activists in the Bay area. Please keep telling this story. Ha ! ...And get me my soros check ! I'm poor

On 02/05/2017 12:07 PM, jim bell wrote:

I think Razer, who was completely unwilling to define the difference between a mere conservative, and a "fascist", is displaying the same kind of obscure inconsistency in meaning.

Jim Bell

Whatever jackass. While the left or so-called left debates the ethics of Nazi punching the Right is cheering the potential legalization of killing protesters who block roads. GO FUCK YOURSELF. You're just more proof to the world Libertarians are fascists. I'll write this down ONE MORE TIME DUPLICATING THE RECORD because you're too fucking STUPID to look it up; Fascism cannot be conservative, using "American Tradition" as a benchmark, because conservatives understand that some things, such as the internet, did not exist at the time the US founders wrote the constitution and they MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR MODERNIZATION in the documents and laws regarding it. Fascism and it's idea of TRADITIONALISM would eliminate the internet because it 'interferes' with those documents. Now fuck off to 160 meters where brain dead morons like you can feel free to infest the bands and no one will listen except other brain dead morons. Rr

On 02/05/2017 01:21 PM, jim bell wrote:

First, I did a search of my mailbox for "Fascism cannot be conservative", which presumably would find any prior CP comments that you made containing this. I found nothing. I then did a search for "Fascism cannot", and I still found nothing. You claim you are "duplicating the record". I don't see that.

I said DUPLICATING. NOT BOILERPLATING. It's there. My mail expunges after a few day because of all the shitposting on this list but what I wrote is damn near verbatim. Now fuck off.

On 02/05/2017 01:21 PM, jim bell wrote:

If your working definition (or, at least example) of a "fascist" is a person who wants to completely shut down the Internet, I doubt whether this collection of people exceeds more than 1% of America's population.

What your failing to acknowledge. Intentionally AFAICT because you're an alt-right Nazi at heart playing "Libertarian, is they want to shut it down for anyone BUT that one percent. You want to be part of that one percent... don't you ? I say we should bid you up on the AP market. Would be fitting if your own nasty bitcoin gambling freaks took you out. Oh, and about the Right wanting to slaughter protesters while the protesters debate whether punching Nazis is 'ethical' or 'advantageous'

DETROIT — A county Republican leader in Michigan is under fire for seeming to suggest in his social media posts there should be a Kent State type of crackdown on violent protests like the one that erupted at a university in California last week.

But in an interview Sunday with the Detroit Free Press, Dan Adamini, the secretary of the Marquette County Republican Party, said he apologizes, supports peace and was merely trying to prevent further violence and hatred.

The Marquette resident said that he has received death threats and been harassed by people outraged over his remarks that refer to the 1970 shooting deaths of four students at Kent State University in Ohio by the Ohio National Guard. Nine other students were wounded in what many consider a turning point in public opinion about the Vietnam War.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/05/gop-leader-apologiz... Death threats are too good for this motherfucker. Another Nazi, John McCain, had something truly stoopid to say about Kent State a number of years ago too.

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 12:23:57PM -0800, Razer wrote:

On 02/05/2017 12:07 PM, jim bell wrote:

...

I think Razer, who was completely unwilling to define the difference between a mere conservative, and a "fascist", is displaying the same kind of obscure inconsistency in meaning.

Jim Bell

Whatever jackass. While the left or so-called left debates the ethics of Nazi punching the Right is cheering the potential legalization of killing protesters who block roads. GO FUCK YOURSELF. You're just more proof to the world Libertarians are fascists.

I'll write this down ONE MORE TIME DUPLICATING THE RECORD because you're too fucking STUPID to look it up;

Fascism cannot be conservative, using "American Tradition" as a benchmark, because conservatives understand that some things, such as the internet, did not exist at the time the US founders wrote the constitution and they MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR MODERNIZATION in the documents and laws regarding it.

Fascism and it's idea of TRADITIONALISM would eliminate the internet because it 'interferes' with those documents.

Lame non-answer. And more importantly a false dichotomy to boot - you gotta need for a lotta dichotolobotomi Razer. Getting old? ... or too many bongs in your last 5 decades?

Now fuck off to 160 meters where brain dead morons like you can feel free to infest the bands and no one will listen except other brain dead morons.

Rr

On 02/10/2017 09:52 AM, "Joshua Case" wrote:

rational

So are the people who run world governments that commit Genocide and the officers of corporations poisoning the planet (and our minds, with advertising of the products causing the physical poisoning). You aren't making your case spewball. "Rational" is relative. Rr

I don’t agree with Jim on all points, hardly any maybe, but i’fe heard his stuff, listened to him talk. he’s rational, it seems.