// apologies for the quixotic ranting this involves. it is // directed at a prevailing ideological condition readily // encountered most everywhere and institutionalized, // though also pervades communications frameworks // in which ideas take place, outside logical accounting // beyond language itself, thus bias/distortion built-into // structure for conveying observations, not removed. // science and technology is heavily invested in this // viewpoint, reliant upon it, to the point it is religion- // yet detached from, nonobservant of greater truth. in // this way, a privileged hierarchical perspective where // technological tools themselves operate in bounded // and biased condition as if neutral, due to ideology // when instead warped, twisted, turned against self. // in this way, to interrogate the crooked windmillery (regarding default scenario: waffling into oblivion...) for instance, if the mathematics of zero is off, then use of such equations reliant on this modeling are going to bound observations into a realm of perpetual inaccuracy as a basis for worldview and 'physics' itself likewise, if politically expedient, within this boundary, a model of relativism can continually be reinforced via these mathematics, it further provides a framework that declares a particular reality to be the shared situation, even if this goes against common sense, experience, truth, and knowledge. physics then determining it as if judge, jury, ultimately executioner of 'bad thinking' because it does not conform to the inaccurate model such as astronomers believing goats ruled earth from the moon or whatever other such beliefs, if enforced and stopping other direct observations because they do not conform to the belief system much more accurate in a charged atmosphere that we are beings are _submerged in an information environment, a realm of invisible circuitry that has fundamental relation to pattern and constellations of data, models that repeat as concepts and ideas, and where do these reside, only inside of brains? this is why the jellyfish seemed a useful analogy, a floating sentience suspended in an information rich environment that then is mediated, tuned into, related to and through within certain dimensionality that may change from one being, species to the next and yet some fundamental condition is also shared, held in common, this is the electromagnetic context that is _undocumented in both nature and humans as a continuous circuit throughout the cosmos from the beginning of its existence to peak development of life and sentience unfolding at its very edge, that is where consciousness is operating, alive, interface to reality and able to reflect upon this condition yet without a unified model, EM cosmography necessary before EM cosmology, seemingly, to consider EM nature in relation to EM lifeforms, and then EM humans and EM technology within this realm, as 'consciousness' and concepts like code, programming, 'artificial intelligence' are inherently related to this condition in its truth, yet completely separated from it due to a non- electromagnetic worldview, understanding, as if computers invented and 'contain' charge vs. everything containing charge in a given realm, plants, animals, the air, tools, bodies, minds. the circuit itself not even a concept beyond the manufactured circuitboard in terms of a diagrammatic approach to reasoning, that is processing of reality and decision-making, such that perhaps this too is about circuits, and we cannot reason or communciate in the way we actually think, via patterns as our worldview is disconnected from them, from our own observation, and made into signs instead, held apart from geometry, other structural relations and evaluations that may predate or provide foundation for more ornate descriptions thereafter yet these fundamentals are not secured and instead lost in a non-EM evaluation, as if 'writing to write' or 'coding to code' is a higher connectivity or awareness when instead it is a further detachment from the fundamentals, truth in its logical evaluation needed to secure the modeling, test and correct for errors, the obligation ignored, denied for a simple, quicker lost cause, moving in the wrong direction, forgetting to listen to the compass built-into the self, of the electromagnetic directionality, its connection with this cosmic condition and the naturalness and unity, harmony that could exist with people, environment, tools, instead ignored, disease, disharmony and falsity taking the place of enlightenment then to speak of anything detached from this condition as if encompassing it in a too small, finite worldview, believing infinity can be pre- packaged into a confined condition and then held there as mode of control over it, versus freeing the infinity truth and human reasoning, challenging the concepts and regulations of 'discourse' and 'institutionalization of views', to achieve this greater accuracy, _security instead becomes the very problem that must be combated to defend, uphold the criminal falsity and deception of a false worldview, false reality, false perspective, false beliefs that are normalized, enforced, dictated in this way what is anything in its truth without this electromagnetic context as the foundation for its evaluation, and this in all its dimensionality, not compartmented into narrowed controlled categories that are the basis for its denial via social protocols that seek to uphold a given social order that does not serve or seek this greater truth and instead desires to substitute it, stand-in for it, as guardians though of the false, nothingness code, crypto in this context, tools, computers, programming, reasoning, processing, thought, security, insecurity, tyranny, freedom, laws how do you move from infinite parallel worlds in relativistic conditions into a single shared empirical framework in varying dimensionality via quantum conditions without EM-nature? how do you do this if the mathematics do not allow it. or an absolute framework is not allowed within reasoning via the ideology of relativism as it has been detached from logical accounting beyond the binary onesided belief of ideology. what if the model of information survives death, that like energy, if information is attached to it as pattern in some way, whether morphic fields or other conceptual forms or formatting, patterns that even these computer conversations could already be occurring interdimensionally, beyond given thresholds yet not perceived locally this way. none of it can be rationalized if the foundation for the worldview is off, wrong, fundamentally incorrect and there is every indication that this is the case, yet further, that it purposeful, to maintain control over events by denying the true nature of reality and seeking to control and exploit this against human populations, for their political subjugation that is driven by evil intent, exampled everywhere then to communicate or talk in this realm as if it is not happening, beyond the pale to mention as if craziness. that is threshold of the different groundings, the ruling ideology based on falsity all its circuitry open to hacking and cracking, awaiting horn to announce the games begin... ❉ ✴ ❇ example of diagrams shared on defunct electronetwork-list https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hdp28xagjr4d0us/RX2WLmrK3z