http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html Leah McGrath Goodman @truth_eater What a piece of shit reporting. Journalists compulsively play pop psychologist is reporting on targets to obscure their lack of technical capability. When ridiculed for this they say readers want the gossip because they too lack technical comprehension. Not a single journalist resists the temptation for slimey personal analysis to boost sales from Obama to Putin to Satoshi, from NY Times to Guardian to WaPo to Wired to The Intercept. Still the tech firms suck up to the ignorant outlets for lurid coverage, crypto firms now leading the pack to promote comsec panic for digital cash-in. You, once honorably corrupt, dear cpunks, should be raking it in as if in compelled to rationalize cryptoligarchy. Fuck them dead, the whipsawing comsec windfall bandits. At 09:05 AM 3/6/2014, you wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Satoshi.
;-)
Poor bastard...
Cheers, RAH
--On Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:01 AM -0500 John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html
You guys think the story is to be believed? <--- I know it's a stupid/rhetorical question, but I couldn't help it =P
Leah McGrath Goodman
@truth_eater
What a piece of shit reporting. Journalists compulsively play pop psychologist is reporting on targets to obscure their lack of technical capability. When ridiculed for this they say readers want the gossip because they too lack technical comprehension.
Not a single journalist resists the temptation for slimey personal analysis to boost sales from Obama to Putin to Satoshi, from NY Times to Guardian to WaPo to Wired to The Intercept.
Still the tech firms suck up to the ignorant outlets for lurid coverage, crypto firms now leading the pack to promote comsec panic for digital cash-in. You, once honorably corrupt, dear cpunks, should be raking it in as if in compelled to rationalize cryptoligarchy.
Fuck them dead, the whipsawing comsec windfall bandits.
At 09:05 AM 3/6/2014, you wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Satoshi.
;-)
Poor bastard...
Cheers, RAH
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html
Leah McGrath Goodman @truth_eater What a piece of shit reporting. Journalists compulsively play pop psychologist is reporting on targets to obscure their lack of technical capability. When ridiculed for this they say readers want the gossip because they too lack technical comprehension.
Not a single journalist resists the temptation for slimey personal analysis to boost sales from Obama to Putin to Satoshi, from NY Times to Guardian to WaPo to Wired to The Intercept.
Still the tech firms suck up to the ignorant outlets for lurid coverage, crypto firms now leading the pack to promote comsec panic for digital cash-in. You, once honorably corrupt, dear cpunks, should be raking it in as if in compelled to rationalize cryptoligarchy.
Fuck them dead, the whipsawing comsec windfall bandits.
fuck them dead > thats a good one @mtaibbi said the press pools he has been in taught him one major thing journalists are bred to be stupid - he was astonished at their stupidity level but now he is at the intercept crap so.. stupidity rules and all hail to capitalistic fuck alls but i have to disagree with you re the story in terms of the personal analysis re content - they do get into the tech not perfectly but... trying to figure out why someone would want to remain anonymous in this society of star fuckers into infinity is part of the story of bitcoin and there were forensic analysts working on the story the cia connection is interesting when cia mentioned > he is gone - out totally out
At 09:05 AM 3/6/2014, you wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Satoshi.
;-)
Poor bastard...
Cheers, RAH
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Alleged Creator of Bitcoin Chased Around Los Angeles: http://www.businessinsider.com/there-is-a-bitcoin-car-chase-underway-2014-3 The plot coagulates... - -- The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS] Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/ PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/ "It just isn't in my nature to buy a lot of canned food and move to Alaska and try to escape the gray goo." --William Gibson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEAREKAAYFAlMZAqkACgkQO9j/K4B7F8HbrgCg5kaKCFfOIyXE5fbtVPpJhnkc hxcAoPD+ekm3Q/BTQbtZg+F4keM6EWSw =VSet -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 3/6/2014 3:05 PM, Robert Hettinga wrote:
I *told* you I wasn’t Satoshi.
;-)
Poor bastard...
Cheers, RAH
In a city (LA) where burglars will break into your home for a mere $400 flat panel TV, the journalist involved has just painted a bullseye on this 64 year old man's back, due to the supposed 1,000,000 bitcoins he has. This is a disaster waiting to happen.. I can't believe Newsweek actually published his photo, along with his house and car with visible license plate
Dnia czwartek, 6 marca 2014 16:53:50 Gold IsMoney pisze:
On 3/6/2014 3:05 PM, Robert Hettinga wrote:
I *told* you I wasn’t Satoshi.
;-)
Poor bastard...
Cheers, RAH
In a city (LA) where burglars will break into your home for a mere $400 flat panel TV, the journalist involved has just painted a bullseye on this 64 year old man's back, due to the supposed 1,000,000 bitcoins he has. This is a disaster waiting to happen.. I can't believe Newsweek actually published his photo, along with his house and car with visible license plate
This should be criminal. -- Pozdr rysiek
In a city (LA) where burglars will break into your home for a mere $400 flat panel TV, the journalist involved has just painted a bullseye on this 64 year old man's back, due to the supposed 1,000,000 bitcoins he has. This is a disaster waiting to happen.. I can't believe Newsweek actually published his photo, along with his house and car with visible license plate
This should be criminal.
Far be it from me to pollute this discussion with references to assassination markets and such sundry things as of which there has never been discussion hereabouts, no sir. Dept. of Obiter Dicta
But you guys know there's many Satoshi's right? I mean. They're like Zero or Anonymous!
[fake img] Sign on my cat saying "I am Satoshi!".jpg [/fake img] On Mar 6, 2014 5:12 PM, Peter Tonoli <anarchie+cpunks@metaverse.org> wrote: On 3/7/14, 10:35 AM, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote: > But you guys know there's many Satoshi's right? I mean. They're like > Zero or Anonymous! "I am Satoshi!"
very well played sir... beyond as for putin > the west is in love with russian plutocrat raping of russian resources... money so... no elite fuck wants to touch that mirage [SIC] .... west <3 RF + KSA On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:35 AM, rysiek <rysiek@hackerspace.pl> wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 6 marca 2014 17:41:44 shelley@misanthropia.info pisze:
[fake img] Sign on my cat saying "I am Satoshi!".jpg [/fake img]
From the looks of the cat, it might be *worth* a satoshi, I guess.
-- Pozdr rysiek
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro. Jim Bell ________________________________ From: Robert Hettinga <hettinga@gmail.com> To: cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>; Cryptography List <cryptography@metzdowd.com> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 6:05 AM Subject: See??? I *told* you I wasn’t Satoshi. ;-) Poor bastard... Cheers, RAH
Actually, I should have said: [Headlines from the future] "I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro. Jim Bell ________________________________ From: jim bell <jamesdbell9@yahoo.com> To: Robert Hettinga <hettinga@gmail.com>; "cypherpunks@cpunks.org" <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 9:29 AM Subject: Re: See??? I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro. Jim Bell ________________________________ From: Robert Hettinga <hettinga@gmail.com> To: cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>; Cryptography List <cryptography@metzdowd.com> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 6:05 AM Subject: See??? I *told* you I wasn’t Satoshi. ;-) Poor bastard... Cheers, RAH
From: Robert Hettinga <hettinga@gmail.com> To: "cypherpunks@cpunks.org" <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:29 PM, jim bell <jamesdbell9@yahoo.com> wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro.
But, the *do* want to offer *bounties* on anyone who harms Satoshi, so they’ve got *that* goin’ for ‘em. :-) Cheers, RAH
Clearly, this points to the need to expand the AP/AM implementations to include 'indefinite targets': AP targets whose names aren't known at the time the donation is made. And, even targets who really don't even exist at the time the donation is made. Presumably, Satoshi is still alive and well, thus nobody out there (yet) has harmed him. Somebody might want to put money (BTC) on anyone who would do so. I alluded to this at the time I wrote the AP essay, with my reference to using AP to attack car thieves. Jim Bell
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:10:19PM -0800, jim bell wrote:
From: Robert Hettinga <hettinga@gmail.com> To: "cypherpunks@cpunks.org" <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:29 PM, jim bell <jamesdbell9@yahoo.com> wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro.
But, the *do* want to offer *bounties* on anyone who harms Satoshi, so they’ve got *that* goin’ for ‘em. :-) Cheers, RAH
Clearly, this points to the need to expand the AP/AM implementations to include 'indefinite targets': AP targets whose names aren't known at the time the donation is made. And, even targets who really don't even exist at the time the donation is made. Presumably, Satoshi is still alive and well, thus nobody out there (yet) has harmed him. Somebody might want to put money (BTC) on anyone who would do so. I alluded to this at the time I wrote the AP essay, with my reference to using AP to attack car thieves. Jim Bell
I think you just made Satoshi Nakamoto the most well protected person in history. Well played psy-ops my friend. That's almost as good as the hypothetical game big (insert your boogeyman here) might be playing with Putin to make him think Bitcoin is a NSA/CIA operation to ruin the ruble. I'd rather be a Satoshi than a Vladimir right now. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' hozer@hozed.org 7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.coop Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel, nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash
That's almost as good as the hypothetical game big (insert your boogeyman here) might be playing with Putin to make him think Bitcoin is a NSA/CIA operation to ruin the ruble.
A person of my acquaintance who is a first wave negotiator in international affairs (first wave meaning the deniable precursor labor that occurs before the image-sensitive political class gets visibly involved) recounted how, in discussions in Beijing, this person's counterpart from the "other" side said that it was the assumption in Beijing that Twitter was an American operation constructed to destabilize Iran. This was three years ago. --dan
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:07:53AM -0500, dan@geer.org wrote:
That's almost as good as the hypothetical game big (insert your boogeyman here) might be playing with Putin to make him think Bitcoin is a NSA/CIA operation to ruin the ruble.
A person of my acquaintance who is a first wave negotiator in international affairs (first wave meaning the deniable precursor labor that occurs before the image-sensitive political class gets visibly involved) recounted how, in discussions in Beijing, this person's counterpart from the "other" side said that it was the assumption in Beijing that Twitter was an American operation constructed to destabilize Iran.
This was three years ago.
--dan
And just like Iran, it seems to be all about dead dinosaurs http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/03/putin_ukraine_and_en... It had somehow slipped my mind how 'theoildrum.com' went away, and everyone seems to have forgotten $12/MMBTU natural gas. But now we have a global power play that involves exporting every MMBTU that can be fracked and liquified to choke off Russia's economic air supply. Expect $15/mmbtu gas if we have another polar vortex and $8 corn in 2015 or 2016 if this holds. When I ran across http://oilgascoin.do.am/ (oilgascoin crypto coin) I thought it was a sad attempt at a copycatcoin, but it's looking more like the first sign of a cryptocurrency psy-ops arms race.
participants (14)
-
Cari Machet -
dan＠geer.org -
Gold IsMoney -
jim bell -
John Young -
Juan Garofalo -
Lodewijk andré de la porte -
Peter Tonoli -
Robert Hettinga -
rysiek -
shelley＠misanthropia.info -
Steve Furlong -
The Doctor -
Troy Benjegerdes