Razer's strange love for the Nazi Tim May
So on your Mongoloid planet its like Humpty Dumpy's where a word means what you say it means. Is that right? But either definition is flawed since there is tonnes of evidence Mong was predominantly a US-style libertarian and near all the global libertarians tend to follow the US model. Check out the Btc Maximalist scene, if you don't believe me. Plus anarchists rarely, if ever hyphenate as " Libertarian anarchist " - its either seen as a redundancy or its tainted by association with the Randite, Paultard, Austro-Catholic, Mongoloid crowd that swan around in ' Anarchopulco". Btw - since Ideology means a set of ideas, anarchism is an ideology. The worst possible ideology... apart from all the others.
Ideology is dogmatic like a religion. As far as Anarchism, and Karl Marx; Marx visualized a withering away of the state. Anarcho-Communism, not the crap centralized totalitarian state the bulkshitviks handed the people of Russia. Fidel Castro meditates, then says: "These years have taught us all to meditate more and analyze better. We no longer accept any "self-evident" truths. "Self-evident" truths belong to bourgeois philosophy. A whole series of old cliches must be abolished. Marxist literature itself, revolutionary poitical literature itself, should be renewed because repeating the same old cliches, phraseology and verbiage that have been repeated for 35 years wins over no one, convinces no one at all. There are times when political documents, called Marxist, give the impression that someone has gone to an archive and asked for a form: form 14, form 13, form 12; they are all alike, with the same empty words, in language incapable expressing real situations. Very often, these documents are divorced from real life. And then many people are told that this is Marxism. . .and in what way is this different from a catechism. and in what way is it different from a litany, from a rosary?... ...The communist movement developed a method, a style, and in some aspects, even took on the characteristics of a religion. And we sincerely believe that the character should be left behind. Of course, to some of these "illustrious revolutionary thinkers" we are only petit bourgeois adventurers without revolutionary maturity. We are lucky that the Revolution came before maturity! ~Major Fidel Castro Ruiz, Speech delivered at the closing of the First Conference of the Latin American Organization of Solidarity (OLAS), August 10, 1967 Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice
On 2020-11-14 12:49, Razer wrote:
Ideology is dogmatic like a religion. As far as Anarchism, and Karl Marx; Marx visualized a withering away of the state. Anarcho-Communism, not the crap centralized totalitarian state the bulkshitviks handed the people of Russia.
"True communism has never been tried" Seems like there have been a whole lot untrue communisms tried. Death toll so far is north of a hundred million, and commies still keep trying to implement true communism. And it always turns out that there are a whole lot of live people in the way of true communism who need to be made into dead people. The central flaw of communism is that socialism without a totalitarian terror state leads to economic collapse, and often enough economic collapse even with a totalitarian terror state. Why socialism needs killing fields: http://jim.com/killingfields.html Bakunin foresaw the problem, but failed to address it. Proudhon cheerfully embraced the contradiction "Property is theft, property is sacred" Well it is OK for Christians to embrace a contradiction, Christ wholly man and wholly God, God is three and God is one, but the trouble is that anarchism is for this world, not the next, and you are going to encounter the contradiction in this world, which in Catalonia was resolved by actual anarchists being killed by actual "anarcho"-socialists.
participants (3)
-
jamesd@echeque.com
-
professor rat
-
Razer