Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested "Zwallys team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year" "They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
full of shit
Like when say oposight of what is said, lol
On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested
"Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
"They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be false. Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I said, bullshit.
full of shit
Like when say oposight of what is said, lol
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote:
On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested
"Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
"They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be false.
Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I said, bullshit.
John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news" Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models). Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
full of shit
John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive responses can also be made. This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd probably draw it somewhat like "666". Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/ My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best interest. Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a substantive response - railing against seekers because their seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response program is unlikely to raise the dailog, Zenaan Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning -- Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
BLAH BLAH BLAH TL Did not fucking read -- John
On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote: On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested
"Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
"They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be false.
Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I said, bullshit.
John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news"
Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models).
Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
full of shit
John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive responses can also be made.
This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd probably draw it somewhat like "666".
Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/
My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best interest.
Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a substantive response - railing against seekers because their seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response program is unlikely to raise the dailog, Zenaan Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning
-- Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAH
TL Did not fucking read
Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;)
-- John
On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote: On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested
"Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
"They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be false.
Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I said, bullshit.
John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news"
Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models).
Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
full of shit
John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive responses can also be made.
This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd probably draw it somewhat like "666".
Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/
My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best interest.
Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a substantive response - railing against seekers because their seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response program is unlikely to raise the dailog, Zenaan Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning
-- Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
Ya john - stop feeding trolls -------- Original Message -------- On Nov 29, 2016, 10:48 AM, Mirimir wrote: On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAH
TL Did not fucking read
Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;)
-- John
On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote: On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested
"Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
"They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be false.
Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I said, bullshit.
John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news"
Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models).
Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
full of shit
John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive responses can also be made.
This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd probably draw it somewhat like "666".
Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/
My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best interest.
Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a substantive response - railing against seekers because their seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response program is unlikely to raise the dailog, Zenaan Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning
-- Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAH
TL Did not fucking read
Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;)
I created a lovely, gorgeous, supercalifragilisticexpialidocious filter to send Zzz's garbage directly to my trash, but all the times when someone replies to him, my poor inbox feels sad... Snif, snif! :(
On 11/29/2016 05:38 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAH
TL Did not fucking read
Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;)
I created a lovely, gorgeous, supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
filter to send Zzz's garbage directly to my trash, but all the times when someone replies to him, my poor inbox feels sad... Snif, snif! :(
I'm filtering now on both From and Body :)
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 06:52:59PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
On 11/29/2016 05:38 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAH
TL Did not fucking read
Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;)
I created a lovely, gorgeous, supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
filter to send Zzz's garbage directly to my trash, but all the times when someone replies to him, my poor inbox feels sad... Snif, snif! :(
I'm filtering now on both From and Body :)
How? Can this be done with procmail? -- Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes since 1488
To clarify ; you're a waste of time. I made a mistake (have made many actually) responding to you Zen. My bad. -- John
On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote: On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
John Newman: read the links you sent?
They ar as Zordon suggested
"Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
"They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be false.
Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I said, bullshit.
John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news"
Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models).
Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
full of shit
John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive responses can also be made.
This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd probably draw it somewhat like "666".
Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/
My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best interest.
Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a substantive response - railing against seekers because their seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response program is unlikely to raise the dailog, Zenaan Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning
-- Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
participants (6)
-
Cecilia Tanaka -
John Newman -
Mirimir -
rooty -
xorcist at sigaint.org -
Zenaan Harkness