On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote:
> BLAH BLAH BLAH
>
> TL Did not fucking read

Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to
him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;)

> --
> John
>
>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict@sigaint.org> wrote:
>>>>> John Newman:
>>>>> read the links you sent?
>>>>
>>>> They ar as Zordon suggested
>>>>
>>>> "Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East
>>>> Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year,
>>>> while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the
>>>> Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
>>>>
>>>> "They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of
>>>> years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East
>>>> Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
>>>
>>> And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been
>>> happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the
>>> article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be
>>> false.
>>>
>>> Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I
>>> said, bullshit.
>>
>> John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject:
>> "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good
>> news"
>>
>> Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of
>> underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models).
>>
>> Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the
>> bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a
>> little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to
>> make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
>>
>>
>>>>> full of shit
>>
>> John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you
>> understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive
>> responses can also be made.
>>
>> This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd
>> funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to
>> draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd
>> probably draw it somewhat like "666".
>>
>>
>> Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed
>> in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may
>> assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know,
>> like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better
>> that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for
>> your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/
>>
>>
>> My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying
>> for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing
>> my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best
>> interest.
>>
>>
>> Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a
>> substantive response - railing against seekers because their
>> seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response
>> program is unlikely to raise the dailog,
>> Zenaan
>> Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning
>>
>>
>> --
>> Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C)
>> Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning
>> Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988
>
>