Lovely, I'm interested in the insanity that would ensue from trying to get 'these populations' to agree on priorities for development efforts. -Travis On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:21 AM, oshwm <oshwm@openmailbox.org> wrote:
On 07/10/15 14:25, Travis Biehn wrote:
Normalizing / randomizing is fine. Anonymity sticks out, hasn't learned to blend in.
Keyboard timing is way down the list gentlemans. If you want to avoid it, get drunk every time you use a webapp.
Fair point, has anyone ever produced a peer agreed priority ordered list of privacy and anonymity threatening devices or software etc classified with either solved/not solved?
It's a simple stupid question and I probably know the answer but is it something needed so that globally all activists/coders/etc can work through it?
-- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>