On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 02:06:22PM +0000, Alfonso De Gregorio wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 11:45:07AM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote:
The real question though is, why would anyone use parameters they didn't generate themselves? All DSA implementations I've seen (apart from some
What about MITM in DH -- where do you get the keys from in this case?
A key-recovery attack may allow the retroactive decryption of past communication sessions, if the network endpoints rely on fixed Diffie-Hellman. Of course, whenever an attacker can successfully mount a MITM attack the current sessions are compromised.
Thanks. Are you referring to "DH as per the fucked RFC" or as "DH implemented properly"?
I'm concerned with Fixed Diffie-Hellman implemented properly. Cheers, -- Alfonso