On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:07:50 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Anonymity is hard, and low-latency anonymity is almost impossible.
People keep throwing this "low latency" term around as if it's some kind of distinction,
yeah agent fairbrother showing yet again that he's a charlatan.
They also use it as apology
and agent fairbrother is parroting the tor-gchq-nsa party line. Shocking.
"Low latency" really just defines the point at which users switch from thinking "Hey this is fast enough to surf the web (or whatever their use case)", to "This shit's too damn slow to do anything, I'm out."
Is that so? Cause if A and B are connected through a 'high speed' fully padded link, they can replace the 'chaff' with their data at will and with very 'low latency'...