12 Jan
2016
12 Jan
'16
7:30 a.m.
Point is the technology is neutral/agnostic to its location and operator - and that a key part of the solution is in fact political. Hell, I'm still wondering who would use such a system in the first place without the imposition of regulation? On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:31:49 AM PST juan wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:15:36 -0800
Alex Stahl <alex@testcore.net> wrote:
Second, he implied that, with the use of these policies, if a message were to traverse a network with nodes operated by the US, Canada, Egypt, India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China and Japan,
I think the actual network would be more like washington, boston, new york, los angeles, london, panama, puerto rico, marshal islands and maybe brussels.