Point is the technology is neutral/agnostic to its location and operator - and that a key part of the solution is in fact political.

Hell, I'm still wondering who would use such a system in the first place without the imposition of regulation?

On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:31:49 AM PST juan wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:15:36 -0800

>

> Alex Stahl <alex@testcore.net> wrote:

> > Second, he implied that, with the use of these policies, if a message

> > were to traverse a network with nodes operated by the US, Canada,

> > Egypt, India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China and Japan,

>

> I think the actual network would be more like washington,

> boston, new york, los angeles, london, panama, puerto rico,

> marshal islands and maybe brussels.