8 Oct
2015
8 Oct
'15
12:58 p.m.
That was it, that the slide might not be authentic or could have been an internal GCHQ mockup. I thought that was worthy of discussion and exploration, but then John accused me of faking the data https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/651777707873837056.
*Juan* juan.g71@gmail.com
*Thu Oct 8 08:58:03 EDT 2015* On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:26:51 -0400 Michael Best wrote: >* In summary, I showed that the information on the slide could have *>* been mocked up, depsite matching the logs for Cryptome.org. * Supposing it was true that you proved that *maybe* the slide isn't authentic, what then? Are you trying to make a more general point? Amd that point is...?