That was it, that the slide might not be authentic or could have been an internal GCHQ mockup. I thought that was worthy of discussion and exploration, but then John accused me of faking the data.

Juan juan.g71@gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 08:58:03 EDT 2015
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:26:51 -0400
Michael Best <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote: > In summary, I showed that the information on the slide could have > been mocked up, depsite matching the logs for Cryptome.org. Supposing it was true that you proved that *maybe* the
slide isn't authentic, what then? Are you trying to make a more general point? Amd that point
is...?