Greg, can you clarify whether or not the list is doing spam filtering? On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 1:49 PM lolwut <lolwut9001@cock.li> wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.pglaf.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview:
Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see < https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?37.120.193.123>] 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [37.120.193.123 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [37.120.193.123 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [37.120.193.123 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 2.8 DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX Delivered direct to MX with Outlook headers
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: lolwut <lolwut9001@cock.li> To: <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org> Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:48:29 -0400 Subject: RE: Dan Kaminsky Dies from Vaccine -----Original Message----- From: cypherpunks [mailto:cypherpunks-bounces@lists.cpunks.org] On Behalf Of Shawn K. Quinn Sent: Wednesday, 28 April, 2021 9:36 PM To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: DAN KAMINSKY DIES FROM VACCINE
On 4/28/21 16:50, lolwut wrote:
Shawn, you should take a look at [link removed] I looked at it, and it looks like the typical conspiracy theory horseshit.
COVID-19 is real, it can definitely kill you, and it is definitely "not just the flu". Thankfully, the pandemic (note, no "l") appears to be almost over.
-- Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com
It's fine that you disagree, and it's fine that you call it "conspiracy theory horseshit", but don't be a dick and deliberately tell everyone that you've removed (read: censored) the link with "[link removed]" when quoting my previous message. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html You can trim out quoted sections for purposes of brevity, of course, but it's clear in this instance that that wasn't your aim. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html In prior messages with Punk, I recall, you also seemed quite keen in obsessively and condescending "correcting" his messages when quoting him (e.g., if he wrote "jew", you would replace it with "[Jew]") as a cheap and easy way to look like the smart one. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
Even if you don't agree with the statement of the author of that page that the coronavirus isn't real, that isn't the entire content of the page. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html I personally think that it is real, and that it can kill you, but not any more than the seasonal flu; and that, regardless of its actual danger, the lockdowns cannot be justified. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html