Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.pglaf.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview:
Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?37.120.193.123>]
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
DNSWL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[37.120.193.123 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2)
[37.120.193.123 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
[37.120.193.123 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
2.8 DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX Delivered direct to MX with Outlook headers
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: lolwut <lolwut9001@cock.li>
To: <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:48:29 -0400
Subject: RE: Dan Kaminsky Dies from Vaccine
-----Original Message-----
From: cypherpunks [mailto:cypherpunks-bounces@lists.cpunks.org] On Behalf Of
Shawn K. Quinn
Sent: Wednesday, 28 April, 2021 9:36 PM
To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org
Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: DAN KAMINSKY DIES FROM VACCINE
>On 4/28/21 16:50, lolwut wrote:
>> Shawn, you should take a look at [link removed]
>I looked at it, and it looks like the typical conspiracy theory horseshit.
>COVID-19 is real, it can definitely kill you, and it is definitely "not
just the flu". Thankfully, the pandemic (note, no "l") appears to be almost
over.
>--
>Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn@rushpost.com>
>http://www.rantroulette.com
>http://www.skqrecordquest.com
It's fine that you disagree, and it's fine that you call it "conspiracy
theory horseshit", but don't be a dick and deliberately tell everyone that
you've removed (read: censored) the link with "[link removed]" when quoting
my previous message. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html You
can trim out quoted sections for purposes of brevity, of course, but it's
clear in this instance that that wasn't your aim.
https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html In prior messages with
Punk, I recall, you also seemed quite keen in obsessively and condescending
"correcting" his messages when quoting him (e.g., if he wrote "jew", you
would replace it with "[Jew]") as a cheap and easy way to look like the
smart one. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
Even if you don't agree with the statement of the author of that page that
the coronavirus isn't real, that isn't the entire content of the page.
https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html I personally think that it
is real, and that it can kill you, but not any more than the seasonal flu;
and that, regardless of its actual danger, the lockdowns cannot be
justified. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html