I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing. The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the dark web, off the deep web and in the search indexes." Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not. -Travis On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug*
Well, there are the access logs ;)
It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better than nothing. In my opinion.
Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think.
Travis
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes, that would explain it.
Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it.
-- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>