I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing.

The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the dark web, off the deep web and in the search indexes."

Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not.

-Travis

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
> A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug*

Well, there are the access logs ;)

It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better
than nothing. In my opinion.

Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think.

> Travis
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes,
>>> that would explain it.
>>
>> Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others
>> despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else
>> secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



--
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub | TravisBiehn.com | Google Plus