From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com> To: jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> Cc: Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com>; cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> On 10/31/15, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
I also solved David Friedman's "Hard problem", see his book, "The Machinery of Freedom", the previously-assumed difficulty or impossibility of providing for the defense of a fully libertarian or anarchistic society. i'd support AP with a basic income in place. otherwise, the few outliers could out leverage even the most widely prevalent crowd dispositions... basic income + assassination politics == awesome future!**[ **this conjecture remains to be proven... ]
This sounds like a contradiction in terms. "basic income" implies that somebody is forced to provide somebody else an income. Someone using force is anathemato AP: Anyone feeling such force can use AP to act against those doing that forcing. Forcing stops. "Basic income" stops. Jim Bell