From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com>
To: jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com>
Cc: Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com>; cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
On 10/31/15, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:

> ...
>> I also solved David Friedman's "Hard problem", see his book, "The
>> Machinery of Freedom", the previously-assumed difficulty or impossibility
>> of providing for the defense of a fully libertarian or anarchistic society.

>i'd support AP with a basic income in place. otherwise, the few
>outliers could out leverage even the most widely prevalent crowd
>dispositions...
>basic income + assassination politics == awesome future!**

[ **this conjecture remains to be proven... ]

This sounds like a contradiction in terms. "basic income" implies that somebody

is forced to provide somebody else an income. Someone using force is anathema

to AP: Anyone feeling such force can use AP to act against those doing that

forcing. Forcing stops. "Basic income" stops.

Jim Bell