Re: ITAR double standards?

3/26/96, Timothy C. May wrote:
So, did Intel have to apply to the State Department's office on munitions exports in order to send engineers to Malaysia, Israel, Germany, Ireland, etc., to do development work? Not that I ever heard. Engineers simply hopped on planes and that was that.
So true. When I worked in Silicon Valley firms, I noticed how International Air Courier services were used entirely like Interdepartmental Mail, with no concern for export laws or import duties, etc. If we travelled overseas, _of course_ we took our laptop with all it's software (including encryption), and _of course_ we'd leave software copies on colleagues hard disks, after doing demos and such. All with a sense of total righteousness -- we were tax-paying wage-earners just doing our job. There's a real irony here, if you think about the Barlow-expressed sentiment that cyberspace is a new free domain, having achieved escape velocity from terrestial anachronisms. While Barlow's critics, it seems, demolished _that_ thesis as wishful thinking, there's a parallel thesis that may actually be true: that _corporate environments_ have achieved escape velocity from civil jurisdiction, and now live in a world where rules & ethics are relative only to corporate culture, and "parochial" national laws are to be quietly ignored, knowing there's a highly-paid legal staff to deal with occasional embarrasments. We dream and they implement. Cheers, Richard rkmoore@iol.ie (not on cypherpunks) ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~--~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~ Posted by Richard K. Moore - rkmoore@iol.ie - Wexford, Ireland Cyberlib: www | ftp --> ftp://ftp.iol.ie/users/rkmoore/cyberlib ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~--~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~

On Wed, 27 Mar 1996, Richard K. Moore wrote:
velocity from terrestial anachronisms. While Barlow's critics, it seems, demolished _that_ thesis as wishful thinking, there's a parallel thesis that may actually be true: that _corporate environments_ have achieved escape velocity from civil jurisdiction, and now live in a world where rules & ethics are relative only to corporate culture, and "parochial" national laws are to be quietly ignored, knowing there's a highly-paid legal staff to deal with occasional embarrasments.
I believe in this parallel thesis. As was reported from the dec -95 OECD meeting in Paris:
The statement from SHELL International is interesting. They can accept 'a trustworthy international key escrow infrastructure based on X.509 certificates' but they also need to 'protect their assets against Government intelligence gathering, organised crime, civil unrest and data privacy legislation obligations'.
Asgaard
participants (2)
-
Asgaard
-
rkmoore@iol.ie