attila & maureen on Bubba
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <html><head> <title> Attila & Maureen on Clinton </title> <META name="Author" content="Attila T. Hun & Maureed Dowd"> <META name="Generator" CONTENT="by Attila's hand"> <META name="KeyWords" CONTENT="Clinton,Maureen,Dowd,oral,sex,scandal"> <META Name="Description" CONTENT="Comment on Maureen's comments on Clinton Oval Office Sex Scandal"> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Reply-to" CONTENT="attila@hun.org"> <META http-equiv="PICS-Label" content='(PICS-1.1 "http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" l by "attila@hun.org" r (SS~~000 3))'> </head> <body border=0 bgcolor="f0f0e0" text="black" link="blue" vlink="purple" alink="purple"> <a name="top"></a> <center> <table width=800 align=center valign=top cols=5> <tr height=5> <td bgcolor="f0f0e0" align=center valign=middle width=10> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0a0" align=center valign=middle width=5> </td> <td align=left valign=middle> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0a0" align=center valign=middle width=5> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0e0" align=center valign=middle width=10> </td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="f0f0e0" align=center valign=middle width=10> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0a0" align=center valign=middle width=5> </td> <td align=left valign=top> <center><font size=5 color=700000><b> Clinton's Achilles' Heel </b></font></center> <blockquote> well, this may finally do it for Clinton. if he was not so stupid, he would pack out of white house in the middle of the night, pick up his ill-gotten gains from Switzerland, or wherever he has them stashed, and disappear into the night --but, no, he might be forced to settle for Hillary-- which would be revenge served up cold --they deserve each other. <p> if the Asian crisis was not in full rage, and the US market shaky with worry, we could afford to dump Clinton in the dumpster --unfortunately, the spectacle of an American President actually being successfully impeached will probably blow the American and European markets right out of the water --and the American economy with it --that just might be Clinton's lasting legacy. he may deserve that footnote in history, but the rest of us certainly do not. <p> the NWO powers behind our "throne" may have needed a patsy after their main man became unelectable, but they certainly could have done better than bubba. you'd think they, or even the Democratic power bosses who were against him in the primaries would have done more evaluation of his bimbo patrol mentality before they committed. <p> even I was a little skeptical of the "allegations" in the book "Primary Colors" (particularly to the Hillary affair) and I have been more than a little skeptical of the revelations of the "slave" courier/purveyors who have surfaced, but there may be more fire than smoke. it was certainly understandable why Joe Kline wrote the book as "Anonymous" --he must have been a cypherpunk-- or at least he should also have been using our anonymous remailers and nontracable digital cash. <p> God save us from Al Bore. he needed to have a Spiro Agnew in his future, but Janet Reno saved his skin. he is a decent sort, but I just can not handle the left-leaning socialist son-of-a-bitch with his sanctimonious looks --he needs a circuit riding preacher's floppy hat and a mule-- even if he did go to Harvard. <p> on the other hand, if Al Bore goes down, and they can not agree on a vice-president before Clinton either bales or is smoked out, we would have Newt --that might have been acceptable, except I think Newt either sold out or has been intimidated. <p> <b> <a href="mailto:attila@hun.org"> attila out for the count.... </b></a></blockquote> January 25, 1998 <br> NYTimes OpEd Columnist <br> LIBERTIES / By MAUREEN DOWD <br><b> Not Suitable for Children </b><p> WASHINGTON -- There have been so many people rushing to TV studios in this giddy and cataclysmic week to talk about sex that networks are bringing makeup artists out of retirement. <p> The palaver about whether a 21-year-old White House intern had a particular kind of sex with the President has gotten so graphic that CNN's "Inside Politics" Friday featured a warning that the segment might not be suitable for young viewers. <p> Let's review what we've learned so far. <p> The President a liar? <i> Knew that. </i><p> The President a philanderer? <i> Knew that. </i><p> The President reckless in the satisfaction of his appetites? <i> Knew that. </i><p> The President would say anything and hurt anybody to get out of a mess? <i> Knew that. </i><p> Married men cheat? <i> Knew that. </i><p> Married men cheat with young women? <i> Knew that. </i><p> Married men who cheat with young women lie about it? <i> Knew that. </i><p> Hillary isn't throwing Bill's stuff out on the White House lawn because she is as committed to their repugnant arrangement as he is? <i> Knew that. </i><p> The Clinton team -- those great feminists -- devising ways to discredit women who come forward with reports of Clinton peccadilloes? <i> Knew that. </i><p> The President and his minions dissembling and splitting hairs and playing semantic games and taking forever to find the documents until our attention wanders? <i> Knew that. </i><p> The President has the moxie to pick out a dress for a woman? <i> Didn't know that. </i><p> In the delirium of the scandal, something remarkable occurred. The President reportedly admitted, in a deposition to Paula Jones's lawyers, that, oh, yeah, by the way, he did have that affair with Gennifer Flowers, which he so adamantly denied during the '92 campaign. <p> I still remember James Carville ranting at reporters for being low enough to pay any mind to her, calling it cash for trash. <p> How can he go back on TV and defend Mr. Clinton in another sex scandal by once more trying to throw doubt on another damning tape? <p> At least Mr. Carville looked sheepish. Mr. Clinton's famous rapid-response team seems to have bimbo-battle fatigue. <p> The tapes of Monica Lewinsky, now 24, seem believable, not least because we heard it all before with Gennifer Flowers. Helping to get her a new job, telling her to say nothing went on if anyone asked. "Deny it," Mr. Clinton told Ms. Flowers on tape. "That's all. I mean, I expect them to come look into it and interview you and everything. But I just think if everybody's on record denying it, you've got no problem." The whole modus operandi is right there. <p> Also, why did Vernon Jordan become a patron to a lowly Pentagon assistant if she was nothing special to the President? <p> The reality that looms before the American people is not the impeachment of this President. It is the annulment of this President. He has finally determined his own place in history. He will be remembered as the priapic President. The Oval Office appears to be the bachelor pad of a married man who is the Commander in Chief. Like all addicts, this one is surrounded by enablers. <p> Many Americans had accepted Mr. Clinton as a charming rogue. But the portrait that may be pieced together from the confessions of his willing and unwilling women now looks utterly uncharming. Ms. Lewinsky's nickname for him -- "the big creep" -- could stick. <p> The Clinton doctrine may turn out to be nothing more than a view of the relationship of oral sex -- or Oval sex -- to adultery. CNN's Judy Woodruff reported that religious scholars could find no biblical basis for Mr. Clinton's purported claim to an Arkansas trooper that the Bible says oral sex is not cheating. <p> Ted Koppel actually began "Nightline" Thursday with the following sentence: "It may . . . ultimately come down to the question of whether oral sex does or does not constitute adultery." <p> Well, it sure isn't fidelity. <p> When Mr. Clinton says now that he can't answer questions about sex, lies and tapes because he must hurry back to governance, people will want him to hurry back to self-governance instead. <p> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0a0" align=center valign=middle width=5> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0e0" align=center valign=middle width=10> </td> </tr> <tr height=5> <td bgcolor="f0f0e0" align=center valign=middle width=10> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0a0" align=center valign=middle width=5> </td> <td align=left valign=middle> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0a0" align=center valign=middle width=5> </td> <td bgcolor="f0f0e0" align=center valign=middle width=10> </td> </tr> </table></center></body></html>
At 03:50 +0000 1/25/98, Attila T. Hun wrote:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
the Democratic power bosses who were against him in the primaries would have done more evaluation of his bimbo patrol mentality before they committed. <p>
Good rant, and a surprisingly good one by Maureen. But it's wrong to say that the Dem power bosses were against Clinton in the primaries. I worked for Jerry Brown's campaign staff in '92 and can testify that they were lined up in Clinton's camp ever since his tenure at the DLC. -Declan
participants (2)
-
Attila T. Hun
-
Declan McCullagh