re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3c6858d9a7842ca1b1a8ed02584c3937.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Minty Cuntskin (Sorry Monty, I couldn't resist ;-) wrote:
The producers of the show certainly know that there are terrorist elements and psychopaths who would be watching. They know that these people will be turned on by the imagery of a BATF agent being brutally murdered. They could have told the same story using different imagery. Instead of using graphic violence, they could have expressed the idea of the BATF agent getting killed with a heartrending scene of his wife getting the phone call. That certainly would not have been inflammatory.
But they didn't. The opted to go with a glorification of the act. Why? Incompetence won't wash - anybody getting to national TV has spent years in the business and is a total pro. They know what effect they are having.
True. I think the majority of the Hollywood community is on our side in this one. Folks likes Clint Eastwood have made a sincere effort to expose the BATFucks for the thugs they are. Some of you may recall that Clint has become a vocal critic of the seige at Waco and spoken out against it on several occasions.
They glorified this act of violence to encourage others to do the same. Where is the FBI? Why isn't anybody doing anything? If the life of only one BATF agent is spared, it will be worthwhile! Think of his poor wife and kids.
Yes, imagine having to be related to such a creep. Tim May wrote:
Ah, what has the world come to?
Remailers? ;-)
Though not a panacea, remailers do create some interesting possibilities for the freedom of expression. Nerthus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNF1BiuFWwZe05jcJAQGGmgf7BS7N+fJ9M24l2S9rQ92iU3+/W5/K3AP2 sMdGoOKhsbKYPGhjiH4QjBw1cKWLf+99WqwDzcF+Z662zfElhShZS46TOaboxtof B4QukJGKDws0Hqf5ixG7+H6SqEE0wyjYWMX19o204JJNIvS8dgg0egXzZiJFu6JM aT7NS26jMXl/BAfAz73a3sWMiJ6Td92El05X2Keknblswf4WfrSCPOl1uBefLNzv jE86NY51A2htaQO2mIa6ed1kdBG7GRhyOAw+gwRIAi3E6F7+ORJwMLmMi0lR8LSz f+AqJDkV+INgwHj5algunSACrIkfRdEnMNjPwImFoBNPl7xpXfEBKg== =e2sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a2c2feaf19f1f360e022b667fcdd3cd1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
At 05:24 PM 11/3/97 -0000, Secret Squirrel wrote:
Minty Cuntskin (Sorry Monty, I couldn't resist ;-) wrote:
Just FYI, "Monty Cantsin" is not a real person. According the the Neoism web site (See "Monty's" posts for URL), "Everybody can BE Monty Cantsin, but nobody IS Monty Cantsin." Same goes for Smile Magazine. Neoism encourages its adherents to start their own Smile Magazine. Go figure... Jonathan Wienke PGP Key Fingerprints: 7484 2FB7 7588 ACD1 3A8F 778A 7407 2928 3312 6597 8258 9A9E D9FA 4878 C245 D245 EAA7 0DCC "If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams "Stupidity is the one arena of of human achievement where most people fulfill their potential." -- Jonathan Wienke RSA export-o-matic: print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
participants (2)
-
Jonathan Wienke
-
Secret Squirrel