G writes: But the fact is, people can strip a bill down and *look* at these things for themselves. I seriously doubt any such technology would remain invisible to some lab hack who in an idle moment put it under his SEM for a quick peek. (*any* school that fabs its own ICs could do it trivially in seconds.)
Then anonymous writes: On a slightly related topic, I know of an instance where the Secret Service located a stolen color copier with somewhat greater speed than one might have expected.
Is it possible that these machines either: (1) contain transponders or (2) hide a "signature" in their output ???
I was watching CNBC today and saw that some european banks were having trouble with counterfeit 100 dollar bills. They are calling them "super bills" because they only seemed to have three minor flaws that most experts would not detect. They said that a magnifying glass would not be enough to detect these flaws. Cut to your friendly secret service guy looking at two 100 dollar bills under a microscope. The SS said that they would figure out who was doing it and bust them. The guy actually had a smirk on his face. I suppose the quality of the work is so good; that alone narrows down the field of possibilities. The interpol was speculating that over 1 billion of these superbills were now in circulation. Wow. And I figured the US government was going to drive the dollar into oblivion all by itself! Perhaps they will have help along the way. Perhaps people may be driven to Sandy's (et al) digital cash simply because the technology to counterfeit paper cash is becoming more reliable and available with each passing day. It would be one of those weird things that happen if people were driven to bin-bucks not because of the desire for anonymity - but rather the desire to maintain money's store of value function. Gold coins are looking better every day. Superbills - gimme a break. --------- I'd like a 250 Mhz 128 bit hybrid processor with 64 meg of 8 way interleaved memory, a 10 megabyte per second i/o channel, two 3 gig hard disks, two dat drives with compression, and a large diet coke. -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.3a mQCNAiz4FWMAAAEEALBCb7HZS7V4gbsp9yJ7Yty49jQ9wcgRhkLjNNgdyJbrJZCq 5/sv4Ljy/4AhVhjlJyZS8L3owS8l0ClZVzWw4/kO3KN7MPz4YPPR7+qIlPQVM0yv gWpJ43EZZ8b8cvAkE9HATCKWktY2ReRSX5DLnScDH/n5jivw+MD/UO8fURCVAAUR tCBNYXJrIEhpdHRpbmdlciA8YnVnc0BuZXRzeXMuY29tPg== =VbKi -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Perhaps people may be driven to Sandy's (et al) digital cash simply because the technology to counterfeit paper cash is becoming more reliable and available with each passing day.
Well, ordinary people won't be driven to digicash by this -- after all, it doesn't much matter to the holder whether a given greenback was printed by the Treasury or not, as long as it circulates. And it *will* circulate even if the printing isn't perfect, because nobody but the SS actually looks at the fine details of bills. (The hard part would probably be the texture, weight, and thickness, but I don't think I'd be allowed to do a study.) The point of anti-forgery features in bills is to restrict to the government the power to debase the currency. :-) Forgery, however, may drive the *government* to digicash, and you can bet it won't be the good kind of digicash. Hmm, we've heard that eliminating cash would hit "drug kingpins". We've heard that Syria(?) is printing large quantities of U.S. bills, so we have the terrorism link. I'm waiting from a story to break which ties child pornography to conterfeiting... Eli ebrandt@hmc.edu
participants (2)
-
Eli Brandt -
Mark Hittinger