Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)

Forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 16:03:50 -0400 From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
and you don't want to do a Referral with insufficient proof. Notice that even with proof of multiple felonies the Clintonistas say that they aren't important felonies.
Next time somebody gets busted for possession with intent they need to make reference to this case... "But ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as our President has claimed and clearly demonstrated by his remaining in office, for a person to be convicted on a felony it has to be an important felony. The defence has not proven that this felony has sufficient weight for prosecution. You have no choice but to aquit my client." ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

At 06:28 PM 9/21/98 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
"But ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as our President has claimed and clearly demonstrated by his remaining in office, for a person to be convicted on a felony it has to be an important felony. The prosecution has not proven that this felony has sufficient weight for prosecution. You have no choice but to aquit my client."
Or: Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, we just conducted a favorable/non-favorable public opinion survey about the ADA over there and found out that 3% had a favorable opinion of him 3% unfavorable and 94% were DK or No Opinion. I therefore plead that he has insufficient personal popularity to conduct this prosecution. DCF
participants (2)
-
Duncan Frissell
-
Jim Choate