This isn't true. I don't believe in killfiles. Being on my twit list simply means that you're entitled to a brief acknowledgement of every message you

How polite, like a Courtesy_Copy. Thanks!

send me. Skippy was added after he sent me the 3MB results from the rec.music.white-power vote as a rather limp mailbombing attempt (free clue: it takes a lot more than that to make a dent in our bandwidth or disk space); see http://www.stanford.edu/~llurch/potw2/rec.music.white-powder for that email.

Liar. Since they got rid of the old Bell, Stanford is as good as Netcom in their top level functions, I retreived the above page in a few seconds, it's the terminals and stuff which cause the problems. You, for instance, only use Micro$oft, so you lose out on the use of Stanford's T3's, which I use all the time whenever I'm logged in to Netcom. As if there's anybody stupid enough to use Micro$oft for networking, much less Dial-ups!

...

somebody has placed a global cancel bot on

I was wrong, I was just Dicked a few forge-cancels. He got angry of course, when I added misc.test, which means he can't continue to forge-cancel without quickly alerting me.

...

me. I'm gonna have plenty of fun figuring this out. Kwow any good sniffers?

The one that used to be running on darth.stanford.edu was pretty good. Since February 22nd, I've working on the assumption that everything I do unencrypted is public. I would revoke my PGP key, but I never used it much for receiving mail anyway, and I'm not sure that it was found.

You could explain to us what you are talking about, but that would threaten your B1!?3 status.

...

I agree the list should be public usenet: A mail gate-way to a usenet group that ALSO permits unmoderated posts. This would be a nice way to combine a strict moderated mail-list, with a standard netnews group.

Great idea. For stormfront. BTW, can you forge-request another archives for me? I saw a couple of letters before losing the rest. I'm trying to work novell dos with linux and making a general mess of things. Picked up an unwrapped copy for $40, is that a good deal?

Gee, what a great idea! Why hasn't anyone thought of that? hks.net, for example. Unfortunately, there are too many copyright terrorists here.

Never noticed it.

There's a tradeoff between freedom and visibility. As astute readers are aware, hks.net had to take down the archives after WSJ made a threat that was a little too credible.

Never noticed it. You folks are just so damned paranoid. The government's not out to get you, just help you.

-rich

-- Kill Your Television