RE: Junger et al.

My declaration for the Junger lawsuit (available on jya.com) touched on these issues, but the court chose not to accept my reasoning. My quick reading of the decision is that the court took note that sourc and object code are functional (they control a computer), and chose to ignore their ability to express an algorithm and, hence, to communicate the substance of an encryption algorithm to another human being. The court also appears to assume that, because computer source code requires technical skill and training understand, it somehow loses its First Amendment privileges: this I find confusing. Martin Minow (minow@pobox.com) ---Bill Stewart wrote:
language
== Please reply to minow@pobox.com _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
participants (1)
-
Martin Minow