FW: More (and last) on And you thought it was Larry Flynt . . .

More on the same topic -----Original Message----- From: Dave Farber [mailto:farber@cis.upenn.edu] Sent: Monday, December 28, 1998 3:51 PM To: ip-sub-1@majordomo.pobox.com Subject: IP: More (and last) on And you thought it was Larry Flynt . . . Date: 28 Dec 1998 15:30:58 -0800 X-Sent: 28 Dec 1998 23:30:58 GMT To: farber@cis.upenn.edu From: "Joseph C.Pistritto" <jcp@jcphome.com> On Mon, 28 December 1998, Dave FarberSENT OUT As attractive as this might be as a conspiracy theory, Flint pretty much admitted he had the goods in this case (and claims to have similar stuff on something like 7 or 8 other Republicans and 1 democrat). He's investing quite a lot of his own funds in this particular little enterprise of his. He's apparently quite pissed off that this one leaked before he was able to use the content himself. (after all, as a publisher, the reason you develop content is to use it in print yourself primarily). A more interesting question is how the White House found out about the material a few days before it came out. (which apparently is how Roll Call which ran the story first got ahold of it). There have been persistent rumors of a White House controlled black operation to uh, bring pressure upon, certain people that are in positions to embarrass the President. Apparently at least some of this sort of activity has gone on for a long time, perhaps since the President was in Arkansas. Whether the FBI would be involved in *that* is an interesting question. Somehow I doubt it, because the risk of public exposure in that situation would be enormous, and there was already an FBI-related scandal early in this administration. Also the Administrator over there is regarded as somewhat of a loose cannon by the folks in the White House. So I kind of suspect the FBI would not be involved in White House led black ops. And I doubt the military would be involved either (given this President's relations with them.) So the reports of private detectives and other non-government people spearheading this squares with what would be rationally expected. I think the FBI may merely have either just gotten lucky and dodged a bullet on this one, -or- they had a deeper cover role in passing the stuff to Flint's people (undoubtably private individuals, so evidence, if it existed in FBI files, could've been fed to someone on the "outside"). Given that no one knew that Livingston was going to be in the position he was in till several days *after* the election, that's reasonably quick response if that is really what happened. Don't believe everything you read in the papers... Cheers, -jcp- -- Joseph C. Pistritto +1 415 706 7270 Belmont, California jcp@jcphome.com

This has to be the decade of Sex, so many public figures have been brought down, one way or another, by it (funny thing I heard on the news from Russia - that if they were to discover that Yelsin had had an affair with a young woman, at least they would know that he was still alive). Perhaps the effects of all this under-the-covers publicity could convince some VIPs of the imperative need for un-adulteratedH^H^H^H^Hextremely strong crypto in theirH^H^H^H^H^ "all our" lives. At least for some types of communication; they still haven't figured out how to keep their paramours from telling everyone about their adventures in wonderland. I wonder if Stewart Baker was sending out that memo with glee? And why did he send it to Dave Farber? .. Blanc
participants (2)
-
Blanc
-
Stewart, William C (Bill), BNSVC