Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court (fwd)
Forwarded message:
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> Subject: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court (fwd)
You need to read the Constitution again, you missed something critical in there.
Nope, I didn't. Nowhere is the Constitution does it say that citizens have a right to welfare money. The State is free to make virtually anything not expressly prohibited by the Constitution a condition for providing welfare.
Yes, Lucky you did. Go read the 10th. The state is NOT (I say again, NOT) allowed to do anything not expressly allowed because the Constitution is a clear refutation of this sort of thinking.
Including that the recipient takes positive steps to forestall the breeding of further welfare recipients. Even making castration a precondition for receiving welfare would be constitiutional. [I do not advocate such a step].
On one hand you rail against the oppression of people by their government and then you promote even further oppression, what a hypocrite. Your eugenic slant on democracy is a disservice. In case you haven't caught the clue, people don't belong to the government. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Participation requires more than just bitching! | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http:// www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage@ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|
At 11:19 AM 8/23/97 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On one hand you rail against the oppression of people by their government and then you promote even further oppression, what a hypocrite. Your eugenic slant on democracy is a disservice.
Let's try this from a different angle... Say it was charity. Would it, in your opinion, be constitutional for a private charity to require Norplant before dispensing the charitable goods and services? --Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred. DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56. http://rc5.distributed.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jim Choate writes:
JC> Forwarded message:
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> Subject: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court (fwd)
You need to read the Constitution again, you missed something critical in >there.
Nope, I didn't. Nowhere is the Constitution does it say that citizens have a right to welfare money. The State is free to make virtually anything not expressly prohibited by the Constitution a condition for providing welfare.
JC> Yes, Lucky you did. JC> Go read the 10th. The state is NOT (I say again, NOT) allowed to JC> do anything not expressly allowed because the Constitution is a JC> clear refutation of this sort of thinking. No, the federal government is barred. The state governments are free to do so (constrained by their own constitutions). For that matter, the federal government shouldn't be involved in the business of affecting the specific welfare of individuals, so it should be a moot issue. But they cover everything by the commerce clause ("A bird landing on your roof will travel between states during migration, so we can regulate the construction of your house."), so they do it anyways. - -- #include <disclaimer.h> /* Sten Drescher */ Unsolicited bulk email will be stored and handled for a US$500/KB fee. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. -- Carlos Nunes-Ueno, 3/29/95 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQBVAwUBM/8eRfCBWKvC9LiRAQGddwH/X8ju6MNj5aWJJm5I0UgnV3k3bqovbHwE ao/s6Ld1L6TWeVQUMs1webSJrDafzuUmWnpSOS44Nza1Z3yfut9yWQ== =ukNu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Nope, I didn't. Nowhere is the Constitution does it say that citizens have a right to welfare money. The State is free to make virtually anything not expressly prohibited by the Constitution a condition for providing welfare.
Go read the 10th. The state is NOT (I say again, NOT) allowed to do anything not expressly allowed because the Constitution is a clear refutation of this sort of thinking.
One can contend that the Con also doesn't particularly permit income redistribution; "providing for the general welfare" wasn't really precisely defined... The 10th does also acknowledge the right of the states to do whatever their people will let them, subject to the rights of the people (also not precisely defined) and the powers delegated by the states to the Feds in the Con.
In case you haven't caught the clue, people don't belong to the government. Y'all appear to be violently agreeing on that point.
# Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list or news, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bill Stewart writes:
BS> Y'all appear to be violently agreeing on that point. Violent agreement is fun. Jim and I frighten our co-workers frequently with our violent agreement. - -- #include <disclaimer.h> /* Sten Drescher */ Unsolicited bulk email will be stored and handled for a US$500/KB fee. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. -- Carlos Nunes-Ueno, 3/29/95 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQBVAwUBNAO+RvCBWKvC9LiRAQFxfQH/ckNG0qnzdNvWnG9Cqtg2bzOisni7xbKZ o6vHvGgDMLr5RpzOwa5vm92+8gaisYXCzTFxJfao4EOL9cAsVPHqBw== =00wa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Bill Stewart -
Firebeard -
Jim Choate -
Lucky Green