...

...

Anyway, after reading the crap below I have been forced to comment. For an individual that parades the title of Doctor (and the indication of intelligence that title should imply) you seem to lack the grasp of what has been stated over and over again. If you can't study the source code, find somone that you trust that can! Prove it *doesn't* work before you knock it.

So you claim that software is secure unless it has been shown to be insecure, while I claim it is insecure unless it has been shown to be secure. Which position do you think more sensible? (rhetorical question, does not require any responses).

I suspect the practical point of view is more sensible, but if that's what you meant i doubt that you would have called your question rhetorical. allen