Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom
Of course, no-one has considered the possibility that the tmp@netcom persona was manufactured and played out over time solely in order to boost the credibility of the 'uni' persona :-) [does anyone have any proof that *either* of these people exist in real life or that all this flurry of pseudo-legal action ever took place???] G(in the spirit of Detweiler, since LD isn't around to suggest it himself :-) )
I've met Uni in person. In article <199405270000.BAA11641@an-teallach.com>, Graham Toal <gtoal@an-teallach.com> wrote:
Of course, no-one has considered the possibility that the tmp@netcom persona was manufactured and played out over time solely in order to boost the credibility of the 'uni' persona :-) [does anyone have any proof that *either* of these people exist in real life or that all this flurry of pseudo-legal action ever took place???]
G(in the spirit of Detweiler, since LD isn't around to suggest it himself :-) )
-- Stanton McCandlish * mech@eff.org * Electronic Frontier Found. OnlineActivist F O R M O R E I N F O, E - M A I L T O: I N F O @ E F F . O R G O P E N P L A T F O R M O N L I N E R I G H T S V I R T U A L C U L T U R E C R Y P T O
gtoal writes -
Of course, no-one has considered the possibility that the tmp@netcom persona was manufactured and played out over time solely in order to boost the credibility of the 'uni' persona :-) [does anyone have any proof that *either* of these people exist in real life or that all this flurry of pseudo-legal action ever took place???]
G(in the spirit of Detweiler, since LD isn't around to suggest it himself :-) )
Actually, I find it hard to lend credence to any soap-opera-type-scenarios of this caliber played out by anonymous personas. And I am a staunch supporter of anonymous-based systems, to say the least. It does, however, give me my recommended daily allowance of chuckles in the newsgroups. ,-) - paul
participants (3)
-
gtoal＠an-teallach.com -
mech＠eff.org -
paul＠hawksbill.sprintmrn.com