Re: "ordinary public"
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
rishab@dxm.ernet.in writes:
It's not a good idea to take this debate to the ordinary public... Time readers, yes...
Well, if "Time readers" aren't the ordinary public, then I give up.
Well, they're a subset of the ordinary public that both reads and has some interest in news issues, but that's a reasonably good start. The folks who only watch TV are a bit different audience, and the folks who don't care about news are less likely to vote...
8166
Age (days ago)
8166
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
wcs@anchor.ho.att.com