anonymous claims the WSJ said:
The arbitrators ruled that RSA hasn't had the right to sublicense the Stanford patents since 1990.
Cylink said it would seek royalties from companies that have licensed software code from RSA and are redistributing it, arguing that they are infringing the Stanford patents.
hahahaha, this is funny if it's true... Anyone know which two patents they are referring to? (diffie-hellman and merkle-hellman?) Any ideas on how this will change the legal status of RSAREF and PGP? andrew
Andrew Loewenstern writes:
The arbitrators ruled that RSA hasn't had the right to sublicense the Stanford patents since 1990.
Cylink said it would seek royalties from companies that have licensed software code from RSA and are redistributing it, arguing that they are infringing the Stanford patents.
hahahaha, this is funny if it's true... Anyone know which two patents they are referring to? (diffie-hellman and merkle-hellman?)
Any ideas on how this will change the legal status of RSAREF and PGP?
I'm much more interested in how this changes the legal status of the D-H derived encryption systems like ElGamal, and how it alters the patent status on the DSS, which is basically also derived from the same root. Perry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andrew Loewenstern writes:
Any ideas on how this will change the legal status of RSAREF and PGP?
Then Perry Metzger replied:
I'm much more interested in how this changes the legal status of the D-H derived encryption systems like ElGamal, and how it alters the patent status on the DSS, which is basically also derived from the same root.
What I'm waiting to see is who sues RSADSI for recovery of royalties paid to Cylink. Imagine how Apple, Lotus, and all of the other bigcorps using RSA must feel right about now: they licensed a patent from the wrong people, and it appears that RSADSI may have known that their rights had expired. What about Roger Schlafly's suit? Anything new on it? - -Paul - -- Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | "Things are much simpler and less stressful perobich@ingr.com | when you don't look to the law to fix things." Not speaking for Intergraph | - Tim May (tcmay@got.net) on cypherpunks Be a cryptography user. Ask me how. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMGAajKfb4pLe9tolAQG8dwP+Mt8frNZVf87eQOlpIGZ0V7fJDD1CoLSg 6yt6inPeTcjUK52rYLV4ut2hm2q7yASsGi2PlXm+oXh9gi5rCjCNClR8ffRI/f3Z PklwDT+KYm9XB9pJfDPJXzVf9jevY7Ge+m4QBFWymXiQ3DLhsu+Mh8kijTO47uJ9 rZHjHPFjBEo= =UAqt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Andrew Loewenstern -
paul＠poboy.b17c.ingr.com -
Perry E. Metzger -
Rob L