-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 09:17 AM 3/8/96 -0500, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security wrote:
Mr. Bell posted:
Note to the rest of you: Observe how Mr. Peterson carefully avoids quoting any material that was contained in my notes to him. This makes his failure to respond to my points less clear. This is entirely intentional on his part.
The reason I avoided references is that the E-Mail in question was sent off line to him personally.
1. Peterson admits he "avoided" references. 2. The "reason" he gave (that the material was sent to me personally) does not justify or even explain his failing to quote my material and respond to it. He could have just as easily sent me email that contained responses to all of my comments, had he chosen to do so.
Fortunately I do not expect others to respect that so avoid saying anything that cannot be made public.
I do not "respect" sleazy people, and especially sleazy people who are trying to evade the issues and their failure to be able to address the matters under discussion by hiding it in email. I refuse to assist others in hiding their dishonesty by such a tactic. Since the matter started out as a public discussion, I chose to keep it public and still choose this.
However in such cases I do not feel any need to requote everything I am responding to.
Except that your failure to quote that material was clearly intended to disguise the fact that you had no satisfactory response (even by your own standards!) to my commentary. This is typical of you. Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMUBtIPqHVDBboB2dAQFZoQP6AjnijC6gNXWewtrRs3PMYLQn/nUQSQ31 vEQcQMVd+M0siyiv9DdARNGM/Vt6vfxuEIRrfZFw3uUTjLJvjHi7MxsD8BEGUbCZ z1+6OA8y3ei7yJ7h3zL7lFi+0m76lA0Njp3HSscRXPkNPAGJR7WnMlJcl6ELsDv5 WZygZS8ivlo= =JTFh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
jim bell