At 2:16 AM 9/8/95, hallam@w3.org wrote:

...

Nope. but the patriots & the cyPHerpunks share a common goal, and belief that it is none of the government's business what we think or want to share with our computers.

Poor you, the only major political party to come out with a pro crypto statement is a socialist party.

On the contrary, the Libertarian Party has come out strongly in favor of cryptography and privacy, and they are consistently either #3 or #4 in popularity. (I believe Peace and Freedom is usually #4 and LP is usually #3.) Their home page (http://www.access.digex.net/~lphq/lphq.html) says: "The LPHQ is the center of activities of the Libertarian Party, the third largest political party in the U.S. We stand for individual liberty, both in terms of personal and financial freedom." It is impossible to argue that the Libertarian Party is opposed in any way to the right to encrypt, and their 1994 platform makes this clear: "We oppose all proposed regulations of civilian research on encryption methods. We also oppose government classification of such research or requirements that deciphering methods be disclosed to the government." I point this out not to argue in favor of the LP here, but to correct a seriously incorrect statement. --Tim May ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^756839 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."