RE: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efaf5/efaf5da89c08c82ce69f5348b29b93503348b509" alt=""
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
6:17 p.m.
On Thursday, September 25, 1997 12:00 PM, Lizard [SMTP:lizard@dnai.com] wrote:
But to do that, you see, you'll need warrents, reasons for suspiscion, and, becuase of the effort involved, you'll only do it for serious crimes with a strong liklihood of conviction. *That* is the 'stauts quo' law enforcement *claims* to want.
and the technical realities of encryption, plus the limitations of any "NETCenter," will force a respect for, or at least compliance with, the 4th amendment. Hooray! Aaron
7744
Age (days ago)
7744
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Aaron Weissman